IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i16p6623-d399657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Cover Changes from 1990 to 2019 in Papua, Indonesia: Results of the Remote Sensing Imagery

Author

Listed:
  • Sri Murniani Angelina Letsoin

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic
    Faculty of Engineering, University of Musamus, Merauke Regency, Papua 99611, Indonesia)

  • David Herak

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic)

  • Fajar Rahmawan

    (INTSIA Foundation of Papua Province, Furia 3 Number 116 Abepura, Jayapura City, Papua 99225, Indonesia)

  • Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic
    Institute of Nutritional Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 28, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Long-term land cover changes play a significant driver of ecosystem and function of natural biodiversity. Hence, their analysis can be used for evaluating and supporting government plans, especially conservation and management of natural habitats such as sago palm. In Papua Province of Indonesia, sago palm has been stated as one of the priority plants in the Medium-Term Development Plan (R.P.J.M.). However, limited studies have examined this palm in one of the Regencies of Papua Province, namely, Merauke Regency. In this study, we performed remotely sensed data imagery and supervised classification to produce land cover maps from 1990 to 2019. During the study period, twenty-one land cover classes were identified. The six classes of the natural forest consist of primary dryland forest, secondary dryland forest, primary mangrove forest, secondary mangrove forest, primary swamp forest, and secondary swamp forest; thus, fifteen classes of non-forested area. Concerning the sago palm habitat, our study evaluated two different categories (1) based on the land cover scheme from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry and (2) according to the peatland land cover ecosystem in Papua. Based on paired samples t -test, the result indicated statistically significant changes specifically at primary dryland ( p -value = 0.015), grassland ( p -value = 0.002) and swamp ( p -value = 0.007). Twelve from 20 districts of Merauke Regency tend to lose the forecasted natural habitat of the sago palm. Therefore, this study suggests the further need to recognize and estimate the yield of sago palm area in these various ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sri Murniani Angelina Letsoin & David Herak & Fajar Rahmawan & Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri, 2020. "Land Cover Changes from 1990 to 2019 in Papua, Indonesia: Results of the Remote Sensing Imagery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6623-:d:399657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6623/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6623/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minmin Zhao & Zhibin He, 2018. "Evaluation of the Effects of Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Service Values in the Upper Reaches of the Heihe River Basin, Northwestern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Rahel Hamad & Heiko Balzter & Kamal Kolo, 2018. "Predicting Land Use/Land Cover Changes Using a CA-Markov Model under Two Different Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Meli F. Saragi-Sasmito & Daniel Murdiyarso & Tania June & Sigit D. Sasmito, 2019. "Carbon stocks, emissions, and aboveground productivity in restored secondary tropical peat swamp forests," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 521-533, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Supriyono Supriyono & Utaya Sugeng & Taryana Didik & Handoyo Budi, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Trend Analysis of Rainfall Erosivity and Erosivity Density of Tropical Area in Air Bengkulu Watershed, Indonesia," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 40(3), pages 125-142, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milad Asadi & Amir Oshnooei-Nooshabadi & Samira-Sadat Saleh & Fattaneh Habibnezhad & Sonia Sarafraz-Asbagh & John Lodewijk Van Genderen, 2022. "Urban Sprawl Simulation Mapping of Urmia (Iran) by Comparison of Cellular Automata–Markov Chain and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Changqing Sun & Yulong Bao & Battsengel Vandansambuu & Yuhai Bao, 2022. "Simulation and Prediction of Land Use/Cover Changes Based on CLUE-S and CA-Markov Models: A Case Study of a Typical Pastoral Area in Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Shishay Kiros Weldegebriel & Kumelachew Yeshitela, 2021. "Measuring the Semi-Century Ecosystem-Service Value Variation in Mekelle City Region, Northern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Cláudia M. Viana & Jorge Rocha, 2020. "Evaluating Dominant Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Predicting Future Scenario in a Rural Region Using a Memoryless Stochastic Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    5. Marta Bottero & Elena Comino & Federico Dell’Anna & Laura Dominici & Maurizio Rosso, 2019. "Strategic Assessment and Economic Evaluation: The Case Study of Yanzhou Island (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Yongjiu Feng & Jiafeng Wang & Xiaohua Tong & Yang Liu & Zhenkun Lei & Chen Gao & Shurui Chen, 2018. "The Effect of Observation Scale on Urban Growth Simulation Using Particle Swarm Optimization-Based CA Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Luoman Pu & Jiuchun Yang & Lingxue Yu & Changsheng Xiong & Fengqin Yan & Yubo Zhang & Shuwen Zhang, 2021. "Simulating Land-Use Changes and Predicting Maize Potential Yields in Northeast China for 2050," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Yuqing Xiong & Hong Li & Meichen Fu & Xiuhua Ma & Lei Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Change Patterns in a Mining-Based City: A Case Study of Wu’an City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Sandip Giri & Sourav Samanta & Partho Protim Mondal & Oindrila Basu & Samiran Khorat & Abhra Chanda & Sugata Hazra, 2022. "A geospatial assessment of growth pattern of aquaculture in the Indian Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4203-4225, March.
    10. Nij Tontisirin & Sutee Anantsuksomsri, 2021. "Economic Development Policies and Land Use Changes in Thailand: From the Eastern Seaboard to the Eastern Economic Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Yangcheng Hu & Yi Liu & Changyan Li, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Value in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Carlos Manjarrez-Domínguez & Mario Iván Uc-Campos & Mario Edgar Esparza-Vela & María del Rosario Baray-Guerrero & Omar Giner-Chávez & Eduardo Santellano-Estrada, 2023. "Geospatial-Temporal Dynamics of Land Use in the Juárez Valley: Urbanization and Displacement of Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    13. César Augusto Ruiz-Agudelo & Francisco Paula Gutiérrez-Bonilla, 2024. "The remnant natural capital of the Magdalena-Cauca basin: immense losses for the 80% of Colombian inhabitants," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 135-153, March.
    14. Jie Liu & Lang Zhang & Qingping Zhang, 2019. "The Development Simulation of Urban Green Space System Layout Based on the Land Use Scenario: A Case Study of Xuchang City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Jinling Zhang & Ying Hou & Yifan Dong & Cun Wang & Weiping Chen, 2022. "Land Use Change Simulation in Rapid Urbanizing Regions: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Jing Liu & Chunchun Hu & Xionghua Kang & Fei Chen, 2023. "A Loosely Coupled Model for Simulating and Predicting Land Use Changes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Cheechouyang Faichia & Zhijun Tong & Jiquan Zhang & Xingpeng Liu & Emmanuel Kazuva & Kashif Ullah & Bazel Al-Shaibah, 2020. "Using RS Data-Based CA–Markov Model for Dynamic Simulation of Historical and Future LUCC in Vientiane, Laos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Abdurrahim Aydın & Remzi Eker, 2022. "Future land use/land cover scenarios considering natural hazards using Dyna-CLUE in Uzungöl Nature Conservation Area (Trabzon-NE Türkiye)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2683-2707, December.
    19. Valentin Ouedraogo & Kwame Oppong Hackman & Michael Thiel & Jaiye Dukiya, 2023. "Intensity Analysis for Urban Land Use/Land Cover Dynamics Characterization of Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso in Burkina Faso," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Yuli Suharnoto & Budi Indra Setiawan & Andik Pribadi & Lili Muslihat & Damayanti Buchori, 2022. "Assessments of Underground Carbon Stocks in Merang-Kepahyang Peatlands, South Sumatra, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:16:p:6623-:d:399657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.