IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i18p5109-d268350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational Thinking and Robotics: A Teaching Experience in Compulsory Secondary Education with Students with High Degree of Apathy and Demotivation

Author

Listed:
  • Belkis Díaz-Lauzurica

    (Department of Computer Science and Automatic Control, UNED, C/Juan del Rosal 16, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • David Moreno-Salinas

    (Department of Computer Science and Automatic Control, UNED, C/Juan del Rosal 16, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In present and future society, all individuals must be able to face the problems, risks, advantages and opportunities that will arrive with new paradigms in the labour market, social relations and technology. To reach this goal, a quality and inclusive education together with a proper and complete formation in technology (communications, robotics, programming, computational thinking (CT), etc.) must be imparted at all educational levels. Moreover, all individuals should have the same opportunities to develop their skills and knowledge, as stated in Goal 4 of the Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainable Education. Following this trend, in the present work, a practical experience about how to teach CT using robotics is developed, showing the results and evaluation of the lessons on robotics taught to students in their 4th year of compulsory secondary education, and where the students showed a high degree of apathy and demotivation. The teaching unit was based on an action research approach that includes a careful selection of pedagogical techniques and instruments to attract and keep the attention and interest of the students. In addition to the robotics lessons, a previous computational thinking training with Blockly Games was carried out, which contributed to noticeably increase the students motivation and to introduce them to the programming of robots. Moreover, gamification was used to motivate and evaluate the individual knowledge, and the students were required to present the work performed through a final project. The individual needs of the students were fulfilled with a daily monitoring. The results show that the pedagogical techniques, instruments and evaluation were adequate to increase the motivation of the students and to obtain a significant learning, showing how the teaching of CT may attract students that have lost interest and motivation, while providing them with abilities that will be essential for the learning throughout life.

Suggested Citation

  • Belkis Díaz-Lauzurica & David Moreno-Salinas, 2019. "Computational Thinking and Robotics: A Teaching Experience in Compulsory Secondary Education with Students with High Degree of Apathy and Demotivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:5109-:d:268350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/5109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/5109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stamatios Papadakis & Michail Kalogiannakis & Vasileios Orfanakis & Nicholas Zaranis, 2017. "The Appropriateness of Scratch and App Inventor as Educational Environments for Teaching Introductory Programming in Primary and Secondary Education," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 12(4), pages 58-77, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hassan Hossein-Mohand & Melchor Gómez-García & Juan-Manuel Trujillo-Torres & Hossein Hossein-Mohand & Moussa Boumadan-Hamed, 2021. "Uses and Resources of Technologies by Mathematics Students Prior to COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Francisco Ruiz Vicente & Alberto Zapatera Llinares & Nicolás Montés Sánchez, 2020. "“Sustainable City”: A Steam Project Using Robotics to Bring the City of the Future to Primary Education Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Sara Calvo & Luciano Celini & Andrés Morales & José Manuel Guaita Martínez & Pedro Núñez-Cacho Utrilla, 2020. "Academic Literacy and Student Diversity: Evaluating a Curriculum-Integrated Inclusive Practice Intervention in the United Kingdom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Wendan Huang & Xiuhan Li & Junjie Shang, 2023. "Gamified Project-Based Learning: A Systematic Review of the Research Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Despoina Schina & Vanessa Esteve-González & Mireia Usart & José-Luis Lázaro-Cantabrana & Mercè Gisbert, 2020. "The Integration of Sustainable Development Goals in Educational Robotics: A Teacher Education Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Morris Siu-Yung Jong & Jie Geng & Ching Sing Chai & Pei-Yi Lin, 2020. "Development and Predictive Validity of the Computational Thinking Disposition Questionnaire," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, May.
    7. José Juan Carrión-Martínez & Antonio Luque-de la Rosa & José Fernández-Cerero & Marta Montenegro-Rueda, 2020. "Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) in Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliographic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Skalka & Martin Drlik & Lubomir Benko & Jozef Kapusta & Juan Carlos Rodríguez del Pino & Eugenia Smyrnova-Trybulska & Anna Stolinska & Peter Svec & Pavel Turcinek, 2021. "Conceptual Framework for Programming Skills Development Based on Microlearning and Automated Source Code Evaluation in Virtual Learning Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-30, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:5109-:d:268350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.