IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i15p3997-d251019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of Grazing Practices in Belgian Dairy Farms: Results of Two Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Françoise Lessire

    (Department of Veterinary Management of Animal Resources, University of Liège, Animal Nutrition Unit, Quartier Vallée 2 Avenue de Cureghem, 6, 4000 Liège, Belgium)

  • Samuel Jacquet

    (Centre des Technologies Agronomiques (CTA), Rue de la Charmille, 16 4577 Modave, Belgium)

  • Didier Veselko

    (Comité du Lait, Route de Herve, 104 4651 Battice, Belgium)

  • Emile Piraux

    (Comité du Lait, Route de Herve, 104 4651 Battice, Belgium)

  • Isabelle Dufrasne

    (Department of Veterinary Management of Animal Resources, University of Liège, Animal Nutrition Unit, Quartier Vallée 2 Avenue de Cureghem, 6, 4000 Liège, Belgium
    Centre des Technologies Agronomiques (CTA), Rue de la Charmille, 16 4577 Modave, Belgium)

Abstract

Numerous publications have highlighted the potential role of grassland in the mitigation of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the agricultural sector. Yet, the preservation of grassland is included in the main objectives of the greening policies of the European Union (EU). To assess how this greening program has influenced the behaviour and perceptions of the dairy sector, two surveys were foreseen during the project LIFE dairyclim and sent to all the dairy farmers of Wallonia (Belgium) at three-year intervals (2016 – 2019). The answer rates reached 32.6%. Questions concerned four topics: General farm description, grazing practices, perceptions and expectations, and general grassland management. Following the results of these surveys, a large majority of lactating dairy cows grazed in Wallonia (96.5%). The main differences between 2016 and 2019 were the increase in size of the dairy farms in terms of surface (77.2 ha in 2016 to 84.4 ha in 2019) and production, the disappearance of small farms of less than 60 cows, and the progression of the organic sector from 9.3% to 11.7%. Perceptions of farmers on grazing differed following their grazing practices: No-grazing farmers were very sceptical about the advantages of grazing. On the opposite hand, organic farmers were very enthusiastic. Awareness of farmers about the preservation of landscape and the image of the sector for the consumers has increased during the three-year period. The requirements of the dairy industry and authorities were cited as incentives to keep grazing. The expectations of the farmers differed from 2016 to 2019 with a smaller proportion desiring to increase their grazing practices and more, staying stable. These results seem to indicate that the support of farmers and the involvement of authorities and stakeholders could contribute to maintain grazing.

Suggested Citation

  • Françoise Lessire & Samuel Jacquet & Didier Veselko & Emile Piraux & Isabelle Dufrasne, 2019. "Evolution of Grazing Practices in Belgian Dairy Farms: Results of Two Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:3997-:d:251019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/3997/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/3997/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianran Ding & Bernhard Steubing & Wouter Achten, 2022. "Coupling optimization with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359529, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Nicolas Schoof & Rainer Luick & Karin Jürgens & Gwyn Jones, 2020. "Dairies in Germany: Key Factors for Grassland Conservation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Tianran Ding & Bernhard Steubing & Wouter Achten, 2022. "Coupling optimization with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/352783, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:3997-:d:251019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.