IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i7p2259-d155426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Drones and 3D Modeling to Survey Tibetan Architectural Heritage: A Case Study with the Multi-Door Stupa

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng Sun

    (School of Architecture, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China
    Key Laboratory of Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation (Southeast University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Yingying Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation (Southeast University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210096, China
    School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

Tibet has an average altitude of 4900 m, a complex terrain, and unique climatic conditions. The technologies used to survey this country’s local architectural heritage must be portable, efficient, and versatile. Low-cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithms can help satisfy these demands. Recent studies employing nadir images from low-cost UAVs and SfM algorithms have reported positive metric results (with centimeter-level accuracy) when modeling 2D objects (e.g., land, roofs, and facades). In Tibet, however, forming a complete 3D model of architectural heritage is highly preferable and doing so requires a camera network that can create nadir and oblique images with various baselines. This study compared the accuracies of surveying a Tibetan stupa using the UAV-SfM method compared with Ground Control Points (GCP) and Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS). The results indicated that the UAV-derived model is accurate enough for most surveying purposes (RMSE = 2.05 cm; 1/2000 of the stupa’s dimension). The accuracy and completeness of the 3D model allowed Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM) and structural deformation analysis to also be undertaken. In addition, the stupa was integrated with geographic data (terrain and infrastructure) for visualization, management, and evaluation purposes at a larger scale. Considering the low cost, portability, and completeness offered by UAV and SfM, this tool offers promise for surveying Tibet’s architectural heritage.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng Sun & Yingying Zhang, 2018. "Using Drones and 3D Modeling to Survey Tibetan Architectural Heritage: A Case Study with the Multi-Door Stupa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2259-:d:155426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/7/2259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lauren Etxepare & Iñigo Leon & Maialen Sagarna & Iñigo Lizundia & Eneko Jokin Uranga, 2020. "Advanced Intervention Protocol in the Energy Rehabilitation of Heritage Buildings: A Miñones Barracks Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-33, August.
    2. Iñigo Leon & José Javier Pérez & María Senderos, 2020. "Advanced Techniques for Fast and Accurate Heritage Digitisation in Multiple Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Siliang Chen & Haozhong Yang & Shusheng Wang & Qingwu Hu, 2018. "Surveying and Digital Restoration of Towering Architectural Heritage in Harsh Environments: a Case Study of the Millennium Ancient Watchtower in Tibet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Peng Liu & Qun Zhang & Kaiyang Zhong & Youman Wei & Qing Wang, 2022. "Climate Adaptation and Indoor Comfort Improvement Strategies for Buildings in High-Cold Regions: Empirical Study from Ganzi Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Srikanth Gururajan & Ye Bai, 2019. "Autonomous “Figure-8” Flights of a Quadcopter: Experimental Datasets," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, March.
    6. Jeoung Yul Lee & Ilkhom Okmirzaevich Irisboev & Yeon-Sik Ryu, 2021. "Literature Review on Digitalization in Facilities Management and Facilities Management Performance Measurement: Contribution of Industry 4.0 in the Global Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2259-:d:155426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.