IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v9y2019i2p32-d226396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Participation in the Development Process of a Mobility Assistance System for Visually Impaired Pedestrians

Author

Listed:
  • Nora Weinberger

    (Institute for Technology Assessment and System Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Markus Winkelmann

    (Institute for Technology Assessment and System Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Karin Müller

    (Study Centre for the Visually Impaired, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Sebastian Ritterbusch

    (iXpoint Informationssysteme GmbH, Pforzheimer Str. 160, 76275 Ettlingen, Germany
    VWA-Hochschule für berufsbegleitendes Studium, Wolframstraße 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Rainer Stiefelhagen

    (Study Centre for the Visually Impaired, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
    Computer Vision for Human-Computer Interaction Lab, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract

Blind and visually impaired people have to cope with the safe movement through public space and the (lack of) knowledge of spatial issues and walkable routes. These challenges often lead to a fear of accidents and collisions, frequently also of disorientation. This, in turn, can result in a reduced radius of action, restricted mobility, and later on, in social isolation. Against this background, the project TERRAIN aims at developing a technical guidance system for orientation and navigation in urban space. For the development of this assistance system, the project pursues an approach in which reflexive, responsive, and deliberative dimensions have been integrated to address the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) in a co-design process. This paper focuses on the participation of citizens independent of vision impairments in the project which provided a variety of relevant indications of impacts and potential technical adaptations from an ‘outer’ point of view. In addition, conclusions can be drawn about the existing desirability and acceptance of the technical solution among the potential users as well as their social environment of potential users. In addition, it turned out that the citizen participation process raised different expectations among the project partners. Therefore, this article evaluates the participation results from the perspective of the technology developers and the technology assessors.

Suggested Citation

  • Nora Weinberger & Markus Winkelmann & Karin Müller & Sebastian Ritterbusch & Rainer Stiefelhagen, 2019. "Public Participation in the Development Process of a Mobility Assistance System for Visually Impaired Pedestrians," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:32-:d:226396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/9/2/32/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/9/2/32/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nora Weinberger & Silvia Woll & Christopher Conrad Maximillian Kyba & Nona Schulte-Römer, 2021. "The Value of Citizen Participation in Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Linda Nierling & Maria Maia, 2020. "Assistive Technologies: Social Barriers and Socio-Technical Pathways," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:9:y:2019:i:2:p:32-:d:226396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.