IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v7y2017i4p29-d116938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Still Troubled: Tunisia’s Youth During and Since the Revolution of 2011

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Roberts

    (Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK)

  • Siyka Kovacheva

    (Department of Applied Sociologyy, University of Plovdiv, Tsar Asen 24, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria)

  • Stanimir Kabaivanov

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, University of Plovdiv, Tsar Asen 24, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria)

Abstract

This paper presents evidence from interviews in 2015–2016 with a nationally representative sample of Tunisia’s 15–29 year olds. We focus on the sample’s political participation and orientations during the revolution of 2011 and subsequently. We find that just 6.6 percent of those aged 15–24 at the time played any direct part in the ‘events of 2011’. Political engagement then and subsequently is shown to have been influenced most strongly by a university education and growing up in a politically engaged family. In 2015–2016, young people were overwhelmingly pro-democracy, supported equal opportunities and status for the sexes, and endorsed values of self-expression, but attached equal importance to economic security and betterment, felt that their country’s traditions should be maintained and respected, and were personally religious, though three-quarters wanted religion to be kept out of politics and government. Although Tunisia is the sole Arab Spring country to emerge with a still functioning (in 2017) multi-party democracy, we find that in 2015–2016, the majority of young people did not trust their elected politicians. Our survey findings suggest explanations for the paradox between young Tunisians’ overwhelming support for democracy alongside intense disappointment with the outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Roberts & Siyka Kovacheva & Stanimir Kabaivanov, 2017. "Still Troubled: Tunisia’s Youth During and Since the Revolution of 2011," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:7:y:2017:i:4:p:29-:d:116938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/7/4/29/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/7/4/29/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carolina Jardim & Sofia Marques da Silva, 2018. "Young People Engaging in Volunteering: Questioning a Generational Trend in an Individualized Society," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Arab Spring; politics; Tunisia; youth;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:7:y:2017:i:4:p:29-:d:116938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.