IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v4y2014i4p654-671d42919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Organization and Regulation of Full Contact Martial Arts: A Case Study of Flanders

Author

Listed:
  • Jikkemien Vertonghen

    (Department of Sports Policy and Management, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Marc Theeboom

    (Department of Sports Policy and Management, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Els Dom

    (Department of Sports Policy and Management, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Veerle De Bosscher

    (Department of Sports Policy and Management, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Reinhard Haudenhuyse

    (Department of Sports Policy and Management, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

To date, martial arts involvement is often described in controversial terms. While some studies report increased anti-social behavior as a result of martial arts involvement, other findings refer to a more positive social and personal development. This paradox has resulted in an ambiguous public discourse on their value and legitimacy as socially accepted sports, often leading to a dichotomization between “good” and “bad” styles of martial arts. Up until now however, there has been a lack of empirical proof that this “good versus bad” perspective divides along the lines of specific martial arts styles. Consequently, the distinct moral and medical concerns regarding the effects of involvement in harder martial arts—combined with their increased popularity, as well as their perceived positive outcomes for specific target groups—have resulted in a growing demand among policy makers to develop (or rethink) their strategy towards the regulation and support of these sports. By means of a case-study approach, the present paper discusses some of the key issues regarding the regulation of a number of full contact martial arts (e.g., kickboxing, Muay Thai, MMA), which are considered to be problematic for (sport) authorities, and which confront sports policy makers in Flanders. In describing the Flemish case, this paper aims to highlight the need to develop a sound martial arts policy that can provide a legitimation base for the provision and organization of full contact martial arts, which have become increasingly popular in recent years.

Suggested Citation

  • Jikkemien Vertonghen & Marc Theeboom & Els Dom & Veerle De Bosscher & Reinhard Haudenhuyse, 2014. "The Organization and Regulation of Full Contact Martial Arts: A Case Study of Flanders," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:654-671:d:42919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/4/4/654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/4/4/654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:654-671:d:42919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.