â€œNothing Exists Except an Earthenware Potâ€: Resisting Sovereignty on Robinsonâ€™s Island
In this essay I would like to focus on â€œThe Beast and the Sovereignâ€â€”and especially the Second Volumeâ€”as being something of an exception to Derridaâ€™s usual hesitations about sovereignty. In other works, such as â€œRoguesâ€, Derrida displays a deep ambivalence about sovereignty insofar as for all of his condemnation of sovereign authority, he fears that what might replace it could be even worse (and, to be fair, he also sees positive aspects of sovereignty as well). In â€œThe Beast and the Sovereign,â€ we find evidence of this ambivalence as well but here, Derrida comes a bit closer to the kind of position advocated by Walter Benjamin wherein sovereignty is an idolatrous practice of politics one which must not be eliminated so much as subverted. In particular, I focus on Derridaâ€™s reading in Volume II of â€œRobinson Crusoeâ€ as a text that both founds the sovereign subject and subverts it (by revealing its vulnerability, its fictional nature). In looking at how the book disappoints as much as it answers sovereign phantasms of authority and unity, I argue that Derrida transfers his own ambivalence about sovereignty to sovereignty itself, subverting and rupturing its central tenets in the process.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:2:y:2012:i:4:p:372-387:d:22295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.