Derrida Contra Agamben: Sovereignty, Biopower, History
This essay is concerned with criticisms of Giorgio Agambenâ€™s biopolitical theory of sovereignty that are developed by Jacques Derrida in his final seminar titled The Beast and the Sovereign (2009). The implicit interlocutor for much of the seminar is theories of biopolitics. However, when these theories are addressed explicitly, it is through the work of Agamben. The article proceeds first with a brief account of the main issues that preoccupy Derrida in the seminar. In general, these relate to conceptualizing sovereignty and its relationship to the division between human and animal. The second section introduces the criticisms of Agamben, which are articulated initially in terms of the latterâ€™s tendency to declare the origin of ideas and concepts. The third section outlines some central aspects of Agambenâ€™s theory that are pertinent for evaluating Derridaâ€™s criticisms. The fourth section turns to the conceptual and textual basis for the criticisms, which involve a way of thinking history and an interpretation of Aristotle. The final section of the paper extrapolates the implications of Derridaâ€™s criticisms for thinking sovereignty and its future.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:2:y:2012:i:4:p:345-356:d:21945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.