Debating "the Social": Towards a Critique of Sociological Nostalgia
Although sociology can be commonsensically and parsimoniously defined as the study of society, the problems of defining such terms as â€˜societyâ€™, â€˜the socialâ€™, and â€˜the social systemâ€™ remain an ongoing irritant of sociological theory. In addition to these traditional conceptual problems, there is currently a strong sense that â€˜societyâ€™ as an empirical reality and â€˜societyâ€™ as a concept are in crisis. Given the contemporary view of â€˜the end of the socialâ€™ there is also manifestly a potent and nostalgic interest in the past as a time of comforting solidarity and meaningfulness. To clarify this debate, we start by making a distinction between three approaches to society, namely structure, solidarity and creation. Nostalgia hinges around the certainties that followed from reliable social structures, and from the comfort of community. We illustrate these forms of nostalgia through an examination of the social philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre. Recognizing that his criticisms of the loss of virtue represent a powerful indictment of modernity, we argue that past societies were also fractured by moral discord. More importantly, MacIntyre rules out the possibility of moral re-invention by excluding the rise of human rights as a moral framework. In conclusion, the forms of social creativity may not enjoy the â€˜stickyâ€™ solidarity of the past, but they do testify Georg Simmelâ€™s idea of the social ( Vergesellschaftung ).
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:14-26:d:16792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.