IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v16y2026i6p196-d1972295.html

Empowering Rural Women for Food Security: Evidence from Pig Production in Post-Conflict Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Leidy Carolina Ortiz-Araque

    (Grupo de Investigación de Innovación, Desarrollo Tecnológico y Competitividad en Sistemas de Producción Agroindustria, Instituto Universitario de la Paz (UNIPAZ), Barrancabermeja 687031, Colombia
    Escuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial, Instituto Universitario de la Paz (UNIPAZ), Barrancabermeja 687031, Colombia)

  • Ingrid Paola Quintana-Leal

    (Escuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial, Instituto Universitario de la Paz (UNIPAZ), Barrancabermeja 687031, Colombia)

  • Sandra Milena Montesino-Rincón

    (Grupo de Investigación de Innovación, Desarrollo Tecnológico y Competitividad en Sistemas de Producción Agroindustria, Instituto Universitario de la Paz (UNIPAZ), Barrancabermeja 687031, Colombia
    Escuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial, Instituto Universitario de la Paz (UNIPAZ), Barrancabermeja 687031, Colombia)

  • Ana Milena Salazar-Beleño

    (Grupo de Investigación de Innovación, Desarrollo Tecnológico y Competitividad en Sistemas de Producción Agroindustria, Instituto Universitario de la Paz (UNIPAZ), Barrancabermeja 687031, Colombia
    Escuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial, Instituto Universitario de la Paz (UNIPAZ), Barrancabermeja 687031, Colombia)

  • Oscar Orlando Porras-Atencia

    (Grupo de Investigación de Innovación, Desarrollo Tecnológico y Competitividad en Sistemas de Producción Agroindustria, Instituto Universitario de la Paz (UNIPAZ), Barrancabermeja 687031, Colombia)

Abstract

Female empowerment in post-conflict rural contexts is strategic for food security and socioeconomic resilience. This study analyzed the relationship between women’s productive empowerment and food security in 40 rural women involved in pig production in Santa Rosa del Sur, Bolívar, Colombia. A mixed approach with a descriptive–exploratory design and longitudinal scope was used. Data collection employed adapted versions of the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (A-WEAgI) and the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), alongside participant observation and reflective thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analyzed via descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation. The baseline revealed low empowerment regarding income, resources, technical capacities, and time. The global A-WEAgI reached 21%, while HFIAS showed moderate food insecurity in 52% of households. Spearman analysis (CS) indicated moderate negative correlations between food insecurity and income (CS = −0.56), access to resources (CS = −0.51), and technical capacities (CS = −0.49), suggesting that greater women´s empowerment was associates with lower food insecurity. Post-intervention, improvements occurred in technical skills, leadership, and organizational participation. Qualitative findings showed increased confidence in Agroindustry activities, though limitations in economic autonomy, commercialization, and domestic workloads persisted. Gender-focused rural strategies enhance productive capacities and food resilience; however, structural barriers related to economic autonomy and gender inequality persist.

Suggested Citation

  • Leidy Carolina Ortiz-Araque & Ingrid Paola Quintana-Leal & Sandra Milena Montesino-Rincón & Ana Milena Salazar-Beleño & Oscar Orlando Porras-Atencia, 2026. "Empowering Rural Women for Food Security: Evidence from Pig Production in Post-Conflict Colombia," Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:196-:d:1972295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/6/196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/6/196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:196-:d:1972295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.