Author
Listed:
- Vitor Gonçalves
(Transdisciplinary Research Center in Education and Development (CITeD), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)
- Elza Mesquita
(Transdisciplinary Research Center in Education and Development (CITeD), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)
- Paula Vaz
(Transdisciplinary Research Center in Education and Development (CITeD), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)
- Ilda Freire-Ribeiro
(Transdisciplinary Research Center in Education and Development (CITeD), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal)
Abstract
As part of the European Erasmus+ IM-PRO-IN-DE project, this article evaluates a qualification course in instructional design for digital learning, with particular attention to Universal Design for Learning (UDL), creative thinking and inclusive education. The study adopted a mixed-methods design, combining quantitative questionnaire data with qualitative open-ended responses and trainer observations. Twelve higher-education students participated in the course evaluation. The results show positive perceptions of the relevance of the training, especially regarding leadership, collaborative work, digital assessment and the pedagogical use of technologies. At the same time, several participants reported only partial gains in their understanding and application of UDL, indicating the need for more applied activities, structured case studies and sustained communities of practice. The article, therefore, contributes a project-based empirical evaluation of teacher preparation for inclusive digital learning, while acknowledging the limits of a small, single-course, self-report study.
Suggested Citation
Vitor Gonçalves & Elza Mesquita & Paula Vaz & Ilda Freire-Ribeiro, 2026.
"Learning and Digital Technologies for Creative Thinking and Inclusion: A Universal Design for Learning Perspective,"
Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:185-:d:1964986
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:185-:d:1964986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.