IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v16y2026i6p169-d1949270.html

Organizational Arrangements in Evidence2Success Communities: Enabling Sustainable Community Transformation for Youth Well-Being

Author

Listed:
  • Jochebed G. Gayles

    (Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Sarah Meyer Chilenski

    (Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Mary Lisa Penilla

    (Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Sylvia Lin

    (Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Megan Galinsky

    (Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Francisco Villarruel

    (Human Development and Family Studies, College of Social Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Patria Johnson

    (Women’s Foundation for a Greater Memphis, Memphis, TN 38103, USA)

  • Charles Henderson

    (University Medical Billing-Operations, University of Utah Hospital and Clinics, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, USA)

  • Jeremiah Newell

    (Mobile Area Education Foundation, Mobile, AL 36608, USA)

Abstract

Building healthy communities requires organizational arrangements that center on resident and community assets while using data to guide decisions. This study examines how the Evidence2Success framework was implemented in three communities, Kearns, UT, Mobile, AL, and Memphis, TN, to understand how citizen-led asset mapping, coalition processes, and funding strategies shape youth well-being efforts. Using an interpretive case-study design, we analyzed process-evaluation interviews, implementation milestones and benchmarks, strengths-and-concerns reports, and community case materials to trace how coalitions mobilized assets, reoriented institutional resources, and adapted evidence-based programs. The results show that broad, cross-sector Community Boards completed most implementation tasks, increased participation by people of color, and developed more inclusive decision-making structures that addressed historical inequities. Coalitions also strengthened data-use capacities, employing youth survey results and local qualitative input to select priorities, braid funding, and make culturally responsive adaptations while maintaining program fidelity. Overall, the findings suggest that when evidence-based planning frameworks are embedded within asset-based, resident-governed structures, communities can build sustainable organizational arrangements that support youth well-being and advance more equitable local systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jochebed G. Gayles & Sarah Meyer Chilenski & Mary Lisa Penilla & Sylvia Lin & Megan Galinsky & Francisco Villarruel & Patria Johnson & Charles Henderson & Jeremiah Newell, 2026. "Organizational Arrangements in Evidence2Success Communities: Enabling Sustainable Community Transformation for Youth Well-Being," Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:169-:d:1949270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/6/169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/6/169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:6:p:169-:d:1949270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.