Author
Listed:
- Alevizos Antonios
(Department of Sociology, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece
Laboratory of Sociology of Culture and Civilization, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 17671 Athens, Greece)
- Maria Petraki
(Department of Business and Organization Administration, University of the Peloponnese, 24100 Kalamata, Greece)
- Eirini Vakalopoulou
(Department of Sociology, Panteion University of Athens, 17671 Athens, Greece)
Abstract
This study examines the multicultural school as a micro-organizational unit, focusing on the interplay of power relations, organizational culture, and everyday pedagogical practices. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with educators at the 16th General Lyceum of Thessaloniki, the analysis situates school life within broader institutional and normative frameworks. Grounded in Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4), specifically Target 4.7 of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the findings show that while educators actively promote intercultural coexistence and democratic participation, their initiatives are constrained by centralized governance and curricular rigidity. Nonetheless, teachers’ personal agency and informal leadership play a crucial role in fostering inclusion, care, and global citizenship values at the micro-organizational level. The study contributes theoretically by reframing the multicultural school through an organizational sociology lens, emphasizing the micro-politics of discretion, institutional logics, and cultural reproduction within school settings. Practically, it highlights the need for structural policy reforms that move beyond reliance on individual teacher initiative and institutionalize inclusive, care-oriented, and sustainability-driven practices within centralized educational systems.
Suggested Citation
Alevizos Antonios & Maria Petraki & Eirini Vakalopoulou, 2026.
"The Multicultural School as a Micro-Organizational Unit: An Organizational Sociology Perspective on Power, Culture, and Everyday Practice,"
Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:5:p:143-:d:1929254
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:5:p:143-:d:1929254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.