IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v16y2026i4p118-d1911463.html

Building Resilience and Equity: An Umbrella Review of Evidence for Crisis Management in Grassroots Sport

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Ciaccioni

    (Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy
    Department of Education and Sport Sciences, Pegaso Telematic University, 80143 Naples, Italy)

  • Youngjun Lee

    (Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Laura Capranica

    (Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy)

  • André Urban

    (OPES APS, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Rachel May

    (European Non-Governmental Sports Organization (ENGSO), 11664 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Sara Massini

    (OPES APS, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Flavia Guidotti

    (Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of Quality of Life, “San Raffaele” Open University of Rome, 00166 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Crises such as pandemics, displacement, climate change, and economic downturns disrupt grassroots sport, undermining participation, equity, and resilience. This umbrella review synthesised evidence on strategies that sustain and adapt community sport participation during crises. Following PRISMA 2020, a protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251132267). PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCO were used as sources, and eligible studies were selected: systematic reviews on grassroots or community sport in crisis contexts. Methodological quality and evidence certainty were assessed using established appraisal frameworks (AMSTAR-2, GRADE, and CERQual). Fifteen reviews (2021 to 2025) were included, spanning health, climate, economic, and displacement crises. Overall certainty of evidence was low. Quantitative evidence showed moderate certainty that psychosocial interventions reduced anxiety and depressive symptoms among youth during COVID-19. Qualitative syntheses provided moderate confidence that organisational safeguarding, culturally tailored programmes, instructor role modelling, and collaborative community approaches support participation and resilience. Conceptual and policy reviews offered frameworks for governance, sustainability, and crisis management, although confidence in these syntheses was generally low–moderate. Across evidence types, recurrent strategies included community-driven and culturally tailored programmes, digital or hybrid delivery, infrastructural and environmental adaptations, and integration of sport within broader sustainability and crisis-recovery policies. This umbrella review integrates heterogeneous evidence to identify key organisational and policy strategies capable of strengthening resilience and equitable participation in grassroots sport during periods of societal disruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Ciaccioni & Youngjun Lee & Laura Capranica & André Urban & Rachel May & Sara Massini & Flavia Guidotti, 2026. "Building Resilience and Equity: An Umbrella Review of Evidence for Crisis Management in Grassroots Sport," Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:4:p:118-:d:1911463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/4/118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/4/118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:4:p:118-:d:1911463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.