IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v16y2026i2p59-d1862830.html

AI in Everyday Life: How Algorithmic Systems Shape Social Relations, Opportunity, and Public Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Oluwaseyi B. Ayeni

    (Department of Law, The University of Buckingham, Hunter St, Buckingham MK18 1EG, UK)

  • Isabella Musinguzi-Karamukyo

    (Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK)

  • Oluwakemi T. Onibalusi

    (Department of Government and Public Policy, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Oluwajuwon M. Omigbodun

    (Department of Law, Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti 362101, Nigeria)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is often framed as a neutral technical tool that enhances efficiency and consistency in institutional decision-making. This article challenges that framing by showing that automated systems now operate as social and institutional actors that reshape recognition, opportunity, and public trust in everyday life. Focusing on employment screening, welfare administration, and digital platforms, the study examines how algorithmic systems mediate social relations and reorganise how individuals are evaluated, classified, and legitimised. Drawing on regulatory and policy materials, platform governance documents, technical disclosures, and composite vignettes synthesised from publicly documented evidence, the article analyses how automated judgement acquires institutional authority. It advances three core contributions. First, it develops a sociological framework explaining how delegated authority, automated classification, and procedural opacity transform institutional power and individual standing. Second, it demonstrates a dual logic of inequality: automated systems both reproduce historical disadvantage through patterned data and generate new forms of exclusion through data abstraction and optimisation practices that detach individuals from familiar legal, social, and moral categories. Third, it shows that automation destabilises procedural justice by eroding relational recognition, producing trust deficits that cannot be resolved through technical fairness or explainability alone. The findings reveal that automated systems do not merely support institutional decisions; they redefine how institutions perceive individuals and how individuals interpret institutional legitimacy. The article concludes by outlining governance reforms aimed at restoring intelligibility, accountability, inclusion, and trust in an era where automated judgement increasingly structures social opportunity and public authority.

Suggested Citation

  • Oluwaseyi B. Ayeni & Isabella Musinguzi-Karamukyo & Oluwakemi T. Onibalusi & Oluwajuwon M. Omigbodun, 2026. "AI in Everyday Life: How Algorithmic Systems Shape Social Relations, Opportunity, and Public Trust," Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:59-:d:1862830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/2/59/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/2/59/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:59-:d:1862830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.