IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v16y2026i2p49-d1857516.html

Museums as Safe Spaces: An Ethnography of Inclusion and Exclusion with Visitors with Down Syndrome

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Tesser

    (LAMA Laboratory, Iuav University of Venice, 30125 Venice, Italy)

  • Gabriele Carmelo Rosato

    (Institute of Anthropology, Pontifical Gregorian University, 00187 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Museums are cultural spaces that should promote accessibility and inclusion for all. However, accessibility is often interpreted as removing physical barriers, overlooking less visible obstacles—such as cognitive, sensory, and communicative challenges—that can profoundly shape the museum experience for people with intellectual disabilities. This paper presents an ethnographic case study conducted in the Veneto region of Italy, in collaboration with a group of individuals with Down Syndrome (DS), aiming to explore their lived experiences of a museum visit. Drawing on participant observation and in-depth interviews, the study examines how visitors with DS engage with the museum environment on behavioural and sensory levels. Findings reveal the impact of environmental stimuli, difficulties in navigating abstract or densely layered visual content, and the importance of embodied interaction with objects and spatial cues. Positive experiences emerged from relational engagement, guided facilitation, and the use of multi-sensory supports. The study underscores the need for museums to move beyond compensatory or charity-based models of accessibility, and instead adopt inclusive design principles that value neurodiversity and participatory co-creation. In doing so, this research contributes to the emerging discourse on how museums can become safe spaces for learning, dialogue, and self-expression for people with intellectual disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Tesser & Gabriele Carmelo Rosato, 2026. "Museums as Safe Spaces: An Ethnography of Inclusion and Exclusion with Visitors with Down Syndrome," Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:49-:d:1857516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/2/49/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/2/49/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:49-:d:1857516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.