IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v16y2026i2p46-d1852741.html

Exploring the Link Between Religiosity and COVID-19 Vaccination Attitudes in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Darie Cristea

    (Department of Sociology, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Dragoș-Georgian Ilie

    (Department of Sociology, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Irina Zamfirache

    (Department of Sociology, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between religiosity and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination in Romania using nationally representative survey data from the Barometer of Religious Life (December 2021). Five survey items measuring religious beliefs and practices were used to construct a Religious Practice Index, whose reliability and one-dimensionality were confirmed through Cronbach’s Alpha and factor analysis. Correlation analysis revealed a small but statistically significant negative association between religiosity and vaccination acceptance (r = −0.106, p = 0.001). Binary logistic regression further indicated that higher religiosity, younger age, lower income, and rural residence were significant predictors of reduced vaccination likelihood, while older age, higher income, and urban residence were associated with greater acceptance. Nevertheless, the model explained only 9.3% of the variance and correctly classified 64.4% of cases, suggesting modest predictive power. These findings indicate that religiosity influences vaccination attitudes but does not serve as a dominant predictor, highlighting the importance of other additional factors that were beyond the scope of this analysis and were not measured.

Suggested Citation

  • Darie Cristea & Dragoș-Georgian Ilie & Irina Zamfirache, 2026. "Exploring the Link Between Religiosity and COVID-19 Vaccination Attitudes in Romania," Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:46-:d:1852741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/2/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/2/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:2:p:46-:d:1852741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.