IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v16y2026i1p30-d1841196.html

Silent Witness as Civic Theology: Zurab Kiknadze and the Ethics of Public Religion in Post-Soviet Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Gül Mükerrem Öztürk

    (Department of Georgian Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize 53000, Turkey
    Oxford School of Global and Area Studies, Russian and East European Studies, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6LH, UK)

Abstract

In post-Soviet Georgia, the renewed visibility of religion in the public sphere has generated ambivalent effects, fostering both social cohesion and identity-based exclusion. This article focuses on the work I Am the Way by Georgian Orthodox thinker Zurab Kiknadze to explore how a non-instrumental, ethics-based conception of public religion can be sociologically conceptualized. Drawing on a qualitative, hermeneutic-narrative method, the analysis identifies two core motifs in Kiknadze’s thought—“spiritual journey” and “silent witness”—and interprets them through the lenses of public religion theory (Casanova), lived religion paradigms (McGuire, Ammerman), and post-secular debates (Habermas). The findings indicate that Kiknadze understands faith not as a marker of dogmatic or ethno-political belonging but as a practice contributing to ethical continuity and the reconstruction of social trust. Within this framework, “silent witness” is defined as a form of faith grounded in consistency, humility, and action-oriented conviction; it is proposed as a transferable sociological mechanism that supports trust, reconciliation, and inclusive citizenship in transitional societies. Centering on the Georgian case, this article offers a conceptual contribution to rethinking the public role of religion in post-authoritarian contexts within an ethical framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Gül Mükerrem Öztürk, 2026. "Silent Witness as Civic Theology: Zurab Kiknadze and the Ethics of Public Religion in Post-Soviet Georgia," Societies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:30-:d:1841196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/1/30/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/1/30/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:30-:d:1841196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.