IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i6p160-d1675836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensory Methodologies and Methods: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen C. Sitter

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Carly-Ann Haney

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Ana Herrera

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Mica Pabia

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Fiona C. Schick

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Stacey Squires

    (Faculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

Abstract

This scoping review examines the application of sensory research methodologies and methods in primary research, guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework. The scoping review addresses two primary questions: (1) what is the extent and nature of research activities that use multisensory methodologies and (2) what is the extent and nature of research activities that use multisensory methods? The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist was used to guide the reporting and mapping process. A total of 80 sources (45 peer-reviewed articles and 35 dissertations) met the inclusion criteria. Findings reveal ethnographic-based methodologies were the most common sensory approach, whereas combined visual and audio methods were the most commonly used techniques. There is the potential for more innovative and inclusive methodologies and methods to expand the use of taste and smell, which remain underrepresented in the literature. Additionally, greater attention is needed to address power dynamics and reflexivity in sensory research to avoid essentializing or misrepresenting participants’ experiences. Future research could improve methodological clarity and consistency while emphasizing accessibility and community engagement. This scoping review contributes to the field of sensory research by synthesizing current practices and identifying gaps that warrant future exploration, particularly in underrepresented sensory modalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen C. Sitter & Carly-Ann Haney & Ana Herrera & Mica Pabia & Fiona C. Schick & Stacey Squires, 2025. "Sensory Methodologies and Methods: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:160-:d:1675836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/6/160/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/6/160/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawn Lyon & Les Back, 2012. "Fishmongers in a Global Economy: Craft and Social Relations on a London Market," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cardullo, Paolo, 2017. "Gentrification in the mesh? Ethnography of Open Wireless Network - Deptford," OSF Preprints jm68s, Center for Open Science.
    2. Dawn Lyon, 2016. "Doing Audio-Visual Montage to Explore Time and Space: The Everyday Rhythms of Billingsgate Fish Market," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(3), pages 57-68, August.
    3. repec:osf:osfxxx:jm68s_v1 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:160-:d:1675836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.