Author
Listed:
- Silvia Cimino
(Department of Dynamical and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)
- Angelo Giovanni Icro Maremmani
(Department of Psychiatry, UniCamillus—Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy)
- Luca Cerniglia
(Faculty of Psychology, International Telematic University Uninettuno, 00186 Rome, Italy)
Abstract
Unstructured free play among children has declined, while digital play via screens has increased, raising developmental concerns. A recent synthesis of this shift is lacking. To review studies (2020–2025) on the decline of unstructured play and rise of digital play in children aged 8–10 and to examine developmental implications, including psychodynamic insights. However, only a minority of included studies reported outcomes specifically for 8–10-year-olds; therefore, age-specific inferences partly rely on studies with broader samples (e.g., 6–12 years), interpreted cautiously. Following PRISMA, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Thirty-five peer-reviewed studies met inclusion criteria. Data were narratively synthesized. Thirty-five peer-reviewed studies met inclusion criteria; twenty-two primary empirical studies were synthesized in detail. Age reporting was often broad (e.g., 6–12 years), and outcome measures were heterogeneous, precluding formal meta-analysis. Findings show reduced free play and increased screen time, with digital use linked to poorer sleep, less activity, and social–emotional risks. Free play supported creativity and regulation. Effect sizes of the selected studies were generally consistent with cross-sectional associations across studies, though effect sizes varied and were not pooled. Balanced play is essential. Unstructured play fosters key developmental skills that digital engagement may not fully replace.
Suggested Citation
Silvia Cimino & Angelo Giovanni Icro Maremmani & Luca Cerniglia, 2025.
"Discontinuation of Classic Toy Play vs. Digital Play Among 8–10-Year-Old Children: A Systematic Scoping Review,"
Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:354-:d:1818656
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:354-:d:1818656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.