IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i12p351-d1817080.html

Barriers and Beliefs: A Qualitative Study of Jordanian Women’s Perceptions on Allowing Companions in the Labour Room

Author

Listed:
  • Roqia S. Maabreh

    (Nursing College, Irbid National University, Irbid 21110, Jordan)

  • Anwar M. Eyadat

    (Faculty of Nursing, Hashemite University, Zarka 13133, Jordan)

  • Hekmat Y. Al-Akash

    (Faculty of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman 11937, Jordan)

  • Abdallah Ashour

    (Nursing College, Irbid National University, Irbid 21110, Jordan)

  • Salam Bani Hani

    (Nursing College, Irbid National University, Irbid 21110, Jordan)

  • Dalal B. Yehia

    (Faculty of Nursing, ISRA University, Amman 11622, Jordan)

  • Raya Y. Alhusban

    (Faculty of Nursing, Zarqa University, Zarqa 13132, Jordan)

  • Naser A. Alsharairi

    (Heart, Mind and Body Research Group, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
    Horizon for Research & Studies, Irbid 21110, Jordan)

  • Hanan Abusbaitan

    (School of Nursing, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA)

  • Sabah Alwedyan

    (Kettering Health, Kettering, OH 45429, USA)

Abstract

Improved maternal experiences and outcomes have been widely linked to the presence of birth companions. However, cultural norms, institutional constraints, and privacy concerns frequently restrict women’s choice of birth companions in many Middle Eastern countries, including Jordan. This study investigated Jordanian women’s beliefs and barriers about the presence of companions in the labour room. A qualitative descriptive study design was conducted using Braun and Clarke’s framework for thematic analysis. Thirteen women (ages 21 to 38 years) with prior pregnancy and childbirth experience were chosen from a free health awareness event in Irbid, Northern Jordan in July 2025, to participate in semi-structured interviews. The responses were recorded on audio tapes and subsequently stored in their original format. Data were coded, transcribed, and then thematically analyzed to identify beliefs and perceived barriers. The most significant beliefs were: (i) emotional and psychological support, wherein companionship was thought to alleviate fear and provide reassurance; (ii) strengthening family ties, as women saw shared childbirth experiences as improving family bonds; and (iii) cultural and religious interpretations, wherein female relatives were frequently seen as more acceptable than husbands. Women reported two barriers to allowing companions in the labour room: (i) privacy and modesty issues, where they feared embarrassment, exposure, and judgment, and (ii) institutional and policy restrictions, such as restrictive hospital regulations. Although Jordanian women recognized the emotional and interpersonal benefits of having company during childbirth, they encountered numerous substantial institutional, cultural, and privacy-related barriers. Improving women’s birth experiences and promoting respectful maternity care may be achieved by addressing these issues through culturally sensitive education, privacy-enhancing infrastructure, and regulatory reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Roqia S. Maabreh & Anwar M. Eyadat & Hekmat Y. Al-Akash & Abdallah Ashour & Salam Bani Hani & Dalal B. Yehia & Raya Y. Alhusban & Naser A. Alsharairi & Hanan Abusbaitan & Sabah Alwedyan, 2025. "Barriers and Beliefs: A Qualitative Study of Jordanian Women’s Perceptions on Allowing Companions in the Labour Room," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:351-:d:1817080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/12/351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/12/351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:351-:d:1817080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.