Author
Listed:
- Yiqiang Feng
(School of Marxism, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Ling Wang
(School of Marxism, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Ziao Chen
(College of Law, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Honglin Tang
(School of Marxism, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)
- Han Qin
(College of Information Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China)
- Siyu He
(School of Marxism, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)
Abstract
Grassroots community governance has gained increasing attention for its vital role in resource integration and multi-actor collaboration. As an innovative governance model, the “Five-Sector Linkage” (FSL) mechanism enhances service efficiency by aligning the efforts of communities, social organizations, social workers, volunteers, and philanthropic actors. However, quantitative research on interaction dynamics within such mechanisms remains insufficient, particularly regarding the optimization of collaborative networks for improved governance outcomes. This study applies Social Network Analysis (SNA) to the “After-School Program” project in Community B, Chengdu, to examine the structural features and interrelations of multi-actor cooperation under the FSL framework. The collaboration network consists of 39 nodes and 1482 links, with a density of 0.370 and an average path length of 1.632, indicating efficient communication and moderate cohesion. Degree and betweenness centrality analyses identify social workers (C1–C3) as key hubs, with C2 holding the highest bridging role (B_C = 81.401). The overall network shows low centralization (4.19%) and limited heterogeneity (2.74%), reflecting a polycentric and resilient structure. Inter-sectoral analysis showed that all nodes interacted with at least one social worker, while community actors (A1, A2) engaged broadly across 18 nodes. Volunteers maintained extensive grassroots connections, while philanthropic resources formed selective but strategic links with 13 nodes. These findings provide empirical insights into the coordination logic of the FSL mechanism and offer guidance for building adaptive, decentralized community governance networks. Future research should explore longitudinal dynamics and cross-community comparisons to further enhance the applicability of the model.
Suggested Citation
Yiqiang Feng & Ling Wang & Ziao Chen & Honglin Tang & Han Qin & Siyu He, 2025.
"Optimizing Governance Networks in Multi-Actor Collaboration: A Case Study of Community Service in China,"
Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:328-:d:1802322
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:328-:d:1802322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.