IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i12p324-d1801573.html

Lau v. Nichols and Contemporary Policy Solutions for Immigrant Education in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Huang

    (BASIS Independent McLean, McLean, VA 22102, USA)

  • Meirong Liu

    (School of Social Work, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA)

Abstract

The 1974 Supreme Court decision Lau v. Nichols established a legal and moral foundation for linguistic equity in American public education. However, the legacy of Lau is still up for debate fifty years later. Through the entwined histories of bilingual education, federal enforcement, and ideological shift, this paper re-examines the ruling. It charts the evolution of dual-language immersion models from transitional bilingual programs, showing how local politics and federal policy have alternately increased and limited linguistic rights. The paper makes the case that Lau ’s original vision has been altered by cycles of progress and backlash, reflecting larger conflicts between assimilation and pluralism, rights and resources, equity and gentrification. It does this by drawing on theories of language ideology and raciolinguistics. This analysis shows that language justice in the US depends on institutional and civic commitment as well as legal precedent by placing Lau within the political economy of education reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Huang & Meirong Liu, 2025. "Lau v. Nichols and Contemporary Policy Solutions for Immigrant Education in the United States," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:324-:d:1801573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/12/324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/12/324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:324-:d:1801573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.