IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i11p312-d1792018.html

Beyond Innovation Niches: A Social Sciences Review of System Building Perspectives in Sustainability Transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Hamman

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Urban and Regional Development, University of Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
    SAGE Research Unit (Societies, Actors and Government in Europe), University of Strasbourg-CNRS-INRAE-UHA-ENGEES, 67000 Strasbourg, France)

  • Patricia Schneider

    (SAGE Research Unit (Societies, Actors and Government in Europe), University of Strasbourg-CNRS-INRAE-UHA-ENGEES, 67000 Strasbourg, France)

  • Céline Monicolle

    (SAGE Research Unit (Societies, Actors and Government in Europe), University of Strasbourg-CNRS-INRAE-UHA-ENGEES, 67000 Strasbourg, France)

Abstract

Amid mounting calls for socio-ecological transition, many social sciences studies have been exploring the processes of societal change. The well-known Science Technology Society studies (STS) approach focuses on the diffusion of innovation niches as an open-ended process ultimately leading to the stabilization of a new regime. Other works have suggested reversing the perspective, i.e., ‘thinking about transitions from the end’. This is a defining characteristic of system building perspectives, which are inherently goal- and sustainability-oriented. This paper presents the state of the art in the social sciences based on a review of international academic journals in English. We use both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Using Web of Science data collected for a period of ten years and the free software IRaMuTeQ (version 2), we have conducted statistical, similarity, and textual analyses of a corpus of 151 texts, following the PRISMA methodology. We discuss the findings of the lexicometric analysis by looking at the content of the article abstracts. While system building is not always mentioned as such, this new perspective is reflected in the literature, especially in research on the energy and food transition, in two main ways: (i) the procedural and substantive dimensions of sustainability transition are both taken into account; (ii) the issue of governance occupies a central place—involving the definition of appropriate instrument mixes and policy mixes—given the need to deal with stakeholders with diverging interests and values rather than only focusing on technological innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Hamman & Patricia Schneider & Céline Monicolle, 2025. "Beyond Innovation Niches: A Social Sciences Review of System Building Perspectives in Sustainability Transitions," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:312-:d:1792018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/11/312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/11/312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:312-:d:1792018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.