Author
Listed:
- Iffath Unissa Syed
(Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, Sharon, PA 16146, USA)
- Jusung Lee
(Department of Public Health, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA)
Abstract
Background: Little is known about women’s contraceptive use in the United States during the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic and the risk of unintended pregnancy. Methods: We compared the weighted response rates on contraception use for female respondents aged 18–44 from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) between 2019 and 2022. Results: Our study reveals a significant increase of 16.1% (CI = 0.145, 0.177) in the proportion of women using contraception in 2022 as compared to 2019. The largest increase in the use of non-reversible contraception was seen in the proportion of female sterilization, at 3.0% (CI = 0.017, 0.043), mostly attributed to non-Hispanic Black individuals with a 12% increase (CI = 0.046, 0.198). The largest decrease was seen in the use of condoms, at 7.4% (CI = −0.094, −0.055). This was driven by both non-Hispanic Black and multiracial groups, each experiencing a 19% decrease (CI = −0.251, −0.127; CI = −0.304, −0.068, respectively). The proportion of women at risk of unintended pregnancy increased by 3.7% (CI = 0.010, 0.063). These increases were observed among those with an income of less than USD 15k, showing a 14.9% increase (CI = 0.037, 0.262). Older females and those with Medicaid insurance were more likely to use female sterilization. Hispanics, college graduates, and those with Medicaid insurance were more likely to use condoms. Non-White females and those without annual checkups were more at risk of unintended pregnancy. Conclusions: Contraceptive methods shifted among females with slightly increased sterilization in the years 2019 to 2022.
Suggested Citation
Iffath Unissa Syed & Jusung Lee, 2025.
"Contraceptive Use and Risk of Unintended Pregnancy Among Females in the United States: Trends and Characteristics Between 2019 and 2022,"
Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-13, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:309-:d:1790772
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:309-:d:1790772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.