Author
    
      
        Listed:
          
- Xiao Li
 (Department of Management, College of Business and Technology, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, NE 68849, USA)
 
- Jordan P. Mitchell
 (Healthcare Administration Department, College of Business, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA)
 
- Phillip J. Decker
 (Healthcare Administration Department, College of Business, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA)
 
- Jae Man Park
 (Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA)
 
 
 
 
Abstract
This study examines how individuals’ perceptions of the importance of their health insurance benefits (Insurance Importance) influence their overall job satisfaction (Job Satisfaction), with health insurance satisfaction (Insurance Satisfaction) serving as a mediator and time spent on insurance administrative tasks or burdens (Time Spent) acting as a moderator. Using survey data from a final analytic sample of 296 participants in the United States, we found that Insurance Satisfaction mediates the relationship between perceived Insurance Importance and Job Satisfaction. Moreover, the positive association between Insurance Importance and Insurance Satisfaction weakens when individuals spend more time managing insurance administrative burdens. Our findings highlight the critical need for organizations to strategically prioritize employee benefits, with a particular emphasis on streamlining and enhancing the efficiency of health insurance administrative process to reduce administrative burdens. By implementing such strategies, organizations can improve employees’ satisfaction with health insurance, thereby boosting their job satisfaction.
Suggested Citation
  Xiao Li & Jordan P. Mitchell & Phillip J. Decker & Jae Man Park, 2025.
"Job Satisfaction, Health Insurance Benefits, and On-the-Clock Health Insurance Administrative Tasks/Burdens: A Moderated Mediation Model,"
Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, October.
Handle: 
RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:292-:d:1775024
 
    
  
    Download full text from publisher
       
 
  
 
    Corrections
    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:292-:d:1775024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
      
      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
      
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
      
        For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
      the various RePEc services.