IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i10p291-d1774435.html

Students’ Perceptions of Remote Work After COVID-19: A Comparative Study of Romania and Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Anamaria Beatrice Aldea

    (Doctoral School of Cybernetics and Statistics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Silvia Parusheva

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Economics–Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Slaveya Zhelyazkova

    (Department of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, University of Economics–Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria)

Abstract

One of the most important changes after the COVID-19 pandemic was the adoption of remote or hybrid work, which has become increasingly common in many sectors and industries. In this context, based on data from a questionnaire survey, this study aims to explore the perceptions and expectations of students from two Eastern European countries—Romania and Bulgaria—regarding working from home as an effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this aim, this study is based on The Job Demands–Resources Theory and the Task–Technology Fit model, which provide an important theoretical framework in interpreting the results. The research employed a non-probability sampling method, with the final sample including 260 respondents from various bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral programs from two universities, 115 from Romania and 145 from Bulgaria. Data analysis was performed using descriptives statistics, nonparametric correlation analysis, nonparametric tests, as well as multinomial logistic regression and a two-step cluster analysis. The empirical results showed that there are significant differences between the two countries in terms of several aspects related to working from home. We found that the national context influences how people perceive the advantages and disadvantages of working from home and what skills are most important in the post-pandemic labor market. However, respondents have similar expectations regarding future working arrangements, with the majority wanting a hybrid work style. Consequently, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a powerful effect on how people currently work, an effect that will also continue in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Anamaria Beatrice Aldea & Silvia Parusheva & Slaveya Zhelyazkova, 2025. "Students’ Perceptions of Remote Work After COVID-19: A Comparative Study of Romania and Bulgaria," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:291-:d:1774435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/10/291/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/10/291/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sostero Matteo & Milasi Santo & Hurley John & Fernandez-Macias Enrique & Bisello Martina, 2023. "Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: potential and actual prevalence of remote work across Europe," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Stefanie Kley & Thordis Reimer, 2023. "Exploring the Gender Gap in Teleworking from Home. The Roles of Worker’s Characteristics, Occupational Positions and Gender Equality in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 185-206, August.
    3. Radziukiewicz, Małgorzata, . "Remote work in Poland and its perspectives," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 14(4).
    4. Loreta Tobia & Pierpaolo Vittorini & Giulia Di Battista & Simona D’Onofrio & Giada Mastrangeli & Pietro Di Benedetto & Leila Fabiani, 2024. "Study on Psychological Stress Perceived among Employees in an Italian University during Mandatory and Voluntary Remote Working during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Christine Ipsen & Marc van Veldhoven & Kathrin Kirchner & John Paulin Hansen, 2021. "Six Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Working from Home in Europe during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Zoltan Musinszki & Magdolna Vallaseki & Gabor Melypatak & Erika Horvathne Csolak & Katalin Liptak, 2020. "Workaholism and a New Generation – Labour Market Survey among Hungarian and Romanian Youth," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1227-1227, November.
    7. Ana Maria Mihaela Iordache & Codruța Cornelia Dura & Cristina Coculescu & Claudia Isac & Ana Preda, 2021. "Using Neural Networks in Order to Analyze Telework Adaptability across the European Union Countries: A Case Study of the Most Relevant Scenarios to Occur in Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-28, October.
    8. Alipour, Jean-Victor & Fadinger, Harald & Schymik, Jan, 2021. "My home is my castle – The benefits of working from home during a pandemic crisis," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Gabriela Neagu & Muhammet Berigel & Vladislava Lendzhova, 2021. "How Digital Inclusion Increase Opportunities for Young People: Case of NEETs from Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Balazs Aczel & Marton Kovacs & Tanja van der Lippe & Barnabas Szaszi, 2021. "Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, March.
    11. Quanling Cai & Weidong Chen & Mingxing Wang & Kaisheng Di, 2025. "Post-pandemic job market: an analysis of factors influencing university students’ willingness for flexible employment based on SEM-ANN-fsQCA," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Dalina-Maria Andrei, 2022. "Remote Work and Technology. A Brief History and Evolutions in E.U and Romania," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 2-11, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anja‐Kristin Abendroth & Yvonne Lott & Lena Hipp & Dana Müller & Armin Sauermann & Tanja Carstensen, 2022. "Has the COVID‐19 pandemic changed gender‐ and parental‐status‐specific differences in working from home? Panel evidence from Germany," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1991-2011, November.
    2. Kongkiti Phusavat & Pacharapong Chunoon & Bordin Rassameethes & Sasivimol Meeampol & Suparerk Sooksmarn, 2023. "Factors Affecting the Use of Building Information Modelling within the Context of Work from Home," Economic, Social and Environmental Sustainability; The Role of Technology and Political Dialogue,, ToKnowPress.
    3. Lee, Kangoh, 2023. "Working from home as an economic and social change: A review," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Begoña Urien, 2023. "Teleworkability, Preferences for Telework, and Well-Being: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-32, July.
    5. Magdalena Gil & Constanza Hurtado-Acuna & Máximo Quiero-Bastías & Marigen Narea & Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar, 2023. "Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on researchers: evidence from Chile and Colombia," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Piotr Lewandowski & Katarzyna Lipowska & Mateusz Smoter, 2022. "Working from home during a pandemic – a discrete choice experiment in Poland," IBS Working Papers 03/2022, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    7. Veronika Harantová & Ambróz Hájnik & Alica Kalašová & Tomasz Figlus, 2022. "The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Traffic Flow Characteristics, Emissions Production and Fuel Consumption at a Selected Intersection in Slovakia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Ioana Gabriela Grigorescu, 2021. "Analysis Of The Pre-University System In Romania Using The Clustering Technique," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 16(3), pages 18-27, September.
    9. Elstner, Steffen & Grimme, Christian & Kecht, Valentin & Lehmann, Robert, 2022. "The diffusion of technological progress in ICT," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Vij, Akshay & Souza, Flavio F. & Barrie, Helen & Anilan, V. & Sarmiento, Sergio & Washington, Lynette, 2023. "Employee preferences for working from home in Australia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 782-800.
    11. Piotr Lewandowski & Katarzyna Lipowska & Mateusz Smoter, 2026. "Mismatch in Preferences for Working from Home: Evidence from Discrete Choice Experiments with Workers and Employers," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 79(1), pages 142-172, January.
    12. Markus Nagler & Johannes Rincke & Erwin Winkler, 2024. "Working from home, commuting, and gender," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(3), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Ourania Tzoraki & Svetlana Dimitrova & Marin Barzakov & Saad Yaseen & Vasilis Gavalas & Hani Harb & Abas Haidari & Brian P. Cahill & Alexandra Ćulibrk & Ekaterini Nikolarea & Eleni Andrianopulu & Miro, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Working Conditions, Employment, Career Development and Well-Being of Refugee Researchers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, July.
    14. Andrea Eriksson & Lotta Dellve & Anna Williamsson & Katrin Skagert, 2022. "How Conditions and Resources Connected to Digital Management Systems and Remote Work Are Associated with Sustainable Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Fernandez Macias Enrique, 2026. "Data, algorithms and platforms: A framework for understanding work and employment in the late digital age," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2026-04, Joint Research Centre.
    16. Chux Gervase Iwu & Obianuju E. Okeke-Uzodike & Emem Anwana & Charmaine Helena Iwu & Emmanuel Ekale Esambe, 2022. "Experiences of Academics Working from Home during COVID-19: A Qualitative View from Selected South African Universities," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Cseres-Gergely, Zsombor & Kecht, Valentin & Le Blanc, Julia & Onorante, Luca, 2024. "The economic impact of general vs. targeted lockdowns: New insights from Italian municipalities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Patrick Gad Iradukunda & Arnaud Iradukunda & Pierre Gashema & Emile Ngabo & Jean de Dieu Tuyishime & Tumusime Musafiri & Thérèse Umuhoza & Ulysse Uwayo & Enos Moyo & Richard Habimana & Claude Mambo Mu, 2025. "From COVID-19 Pandemic Pivot to Progress: Blended Work as a Pathway to Greener African Cities," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, February.
    19. Karolina Oleksa-Marewska & Joanna Tokar, 2022. "Facing the Post-Pandemic Challenges: The Role of Leadership Effectiveness in Shaping the Affective Well-Being of Healthcare Providers Working in a Hybrid Work Mode," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2022. "Working from Home Around the World," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 53(2 (Fall)), pages 281-360.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:291-:d:1774435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.