IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i10p286-d1768880.html

Uneven Grounds: Class, Gender, and the Social Distribution of Work Flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson Lay-Raby

    (Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar 2531015, Chile)

  • Hanns de la Fuente-Mella

    (Instituto de Estadística, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (N.D.-L.), Valparaiso 2340031, Chile)

  • Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia

    (Escuela de Ingeniería Comercial, Departamento de Ingeniería Comercial, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaiso 2390123, Chile)

  • Gonzalo Ríos-Vásquez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaiso 2340025, Chile)

Abstract

This article analyzes the unequal distribution of perceived work flexibility in Chile, drawing on data from the 2023 National Time Use Survey (ENUT). Using multilevel multinomial logistic regression models, this study explores how individual and contextual variables shape the likelihood of perceiving jobs as fully flexible, partially flexible, or non-flexible. The findings reveal that flexibility is a stratified experience: women are more likely to access partial—but not full—flexibility; workers with higher educational attainment report lower perceptions of flexibility, and longer working hours are associated with diminished flexibility. Among the contextual factors, occupation stands out as the strongest predictor, explaining a substantial share of variance across the models. Employers are more likely to report full flexibility, while dependent workers tend to experience only limited forms of autonomy. These results challenge the notion of flexibility as a universally empowering feature of modern labor markets, underscoring the need for policies and organizational practices that address the structural inequalities embedded in flexible work arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson Lay-Raby & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia & Gonzalo Ríos-Vásquez, 2025. "Uneven Grounds: Class, Gender, and the Social Distribution of Work Flexibility," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:286-:d:1768880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/10/286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/10/286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra M. Eldridge & Obioha C. Ukoumunne & John B. Carlin, 2009. "The Intra‐Cluster Correlation Coefficient in Cluster Randomized Trials: A Review of Definitions," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 77(3), pages 378-394, December.
    2. Ashlee Borgkvist & Vivienne Moore & Shona Crabb & Jaklin Eliott, 2021. "Critical considerations of workplace flexibility “for all” and gendered outcomes: Men being flexible about their flexibility," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 2076-2090, November.
    3. German Rodriguez & Irma Elo, 2003. "Intra-class correlation in random-effects models for binary data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 3(1), pages 32-46, March.
    4. Janice Peterson & Barbara Wiens-Tuers, 2014. "Work Time, Gender, and Inequality: The Conundrums of Flexibility," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 387-394.
    5. Osorio, María Lucila & Madero, Sergio, 2025. "Explaining Gen Z’s desire for hybrid work in corporate, family, and entrepreneurial settings," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 83-93.
    6. Tapas K. Ray & Regina Pana-Cryan, 2021. "Work Flexibility and Work-Related Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Menard, Scott, 2004. "Six Approaches to Calculating Standardized Logistic Regression Coefficients," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 58, pages 218-223, August.
    8. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2007. "A multilevel multinomial logit model for the analysis of graduates’ skills," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 16(3), pages 381-393, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feiyu E & Philip Tin Yun Lee & Bingjie Deng & Lili Yang & Michael Chau, 2025. "The Sharing of Disaster-Related Information on Social Media," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 2411-2430, December.
    2. Makoto Chikaraishi & Akimasa Fujiwara & Junyi Zhang & Kay Axhausen, 2011. "Identifying variations and co-variations in discrete choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 993-1016, November.
    3. Dina Lundy & Darrell Norman Burrell & Tracie McCargo & Firmine Mimi Lima & Natasha Harris & Hilda Eke & KerriLaine Prunella, 2025. "Understanding the Psychology of Pregnancy Discrimination as a Challenging Woman’s Mental Health Workplace Dynamic," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2026 0608, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    4. Rousselière, Damien & Joly, Iragäel, 2011. "A propos de la capacité à survivre des coopératives : une étude de la relation entre âge et mortalité des organisations coopératives agricoles françaises," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 92(3).
    5. Yue, Chen & Chen, Shaojie & Sair, Haris I. & Airan, Raag & Caffo, Brian S., 2015. "Estimating a graphical intra-class correlation coefficient (GICC) using multivariate probit-linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 126-133.
    6. Nikolova, Milena, 2016. "Minding the happiness gap: Political institutions and perceived quality of life in transition," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 45(S), pages 129-148.
    7. Shang, Linmei & Heckelei, Thomas & Gerullis, Maria K. & Börner, Jan & Rasch, Sebastian, 2021. "Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Addison, John T. & Teixeira, Paulino & Evers, Katalin & Bellmann, Lutz, 2013. "Collective Bargaining and Innovation in Germany: Cooperative Industrial Relations?," IZA Discussion Papers 7871, IZA Network @ LISER.
    9. Bettina Stadler, 2026. "Flexible working hours: Benefit or burden? A study of occupational differences in five European countries," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 32(1), pages 25-42, March.
    10. Graham, Carol & Nikolova, Milena, 2015. "Bentham or Aristotle in the Development Process? An Empirical Investigation of Capabilities and Subjective Well-Being," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 163-179.
    11. Xiaochen Hu & Xudong Zhang & Nicholas Lovrich, 2021. "Public perceptions of police behavior during traffic stops: logistic regression and machine learning approaches compared," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 355-380, May.
    12. Schoute, Martijn, 2011. "The relationship between product diversity, usage of advanced manufacturing technologies and activity-based costing adoption," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 120-134.
    13. Scott, Nicholas A., 2020. "Where can cycling lift the common good? Regional political culture and fossil capitalism play a role," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Tran Thu & Moritaka Masahiro & Liu Ran & Fukuda Susumu, 2018. "Information effect on consumer adoption for a new beef brand in the Vietnamese market: prior knowledge, appealing the brand distinction, differentiation and similarity," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1014-1034, September.
    15. Eng Joe Tan & Logama Doraisamy, 2025. "The Impact of Flexible Work Arrangement and Technology Integration on Work-Life Balance in Malaysia SMEs," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 16(2), pages 112-142, December.
    16. Brandon J. Restrepo & Eliana Zeballos, 2023. "Working from Home and Emotional Well-Being during Major Daily Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Soto, José R. & Adams, Damian C. & Escobedo, Francisco J., 2016. "Landowner attitudes and willingness to accept compensation from forest carbon offsets: Application of best–worst choice modeling in Florida USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 35-42.
    18. Ko, Joonho & Lee, Sugie & Byun, Miree, 2019. "Exploring factors associated with commute mode choice: An application of city-level general social survey data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 36-46.
    19. Jeffrey T. Macher & John W. Mayo, 2015. "Influencing public policymaking: Firm-, industry-, and country-level determinants," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 2021-2038, December.
    20. Zubair, Hamza & Susilawati, Susilawati & Talei, Amin & Pu, Ziyuan, 2024. "Investigating the role of flex-time working arrangements in optimising morning peak-hour travel demand: A survival analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:286-:d:1768880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.