IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v15y2025i10p276-d1762941.html

Gender Role Reversal in Gig Economy Households: A Sociological Insight from Southeast Asia with Evidence from Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Umar Daraz

    (Department of Sociology, University of Malakand, Chakdara 18800, Pakistan)

  • Štefan Bojnec

    (Faculty of Management, University of Primorska, Izolska vrata 2, SI-6000 Koper, Slovenia
    Institute of Economic Policy and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
    Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Younas Khan

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

Abstract

The rapid growth of the gig economy and digital platforms is challenging traditional gender roles, particularly in developing countries where structural inequalities continue to shape labor and household dynamics. Despite growing global interest in gender equity and digital inclusion, limited research has examined how gig work, digital access, and women’s income contributions interact to influence household gender dynamics within culturally conservative contexts. This study aimed to investigate the multidimensional impacts of women’s participation in gig work on time use redistribution, intra-household decision making, gender ideology, and role reversal within households in Pakistan. Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from a representative sample of married couples engaged in the gig economy across urban and peri-urban areas of Pakistan. A quantitative analysis was conducted employing a combination of an analysis of variance, ordinal logistic regression, hierarchical multiple regression, and structural equation modeling to evaluate the direct and indirect relationships between constructs. The findings revealed that women’s gig work participation significantly predicted enhanced digital access, greater income contributions, and increased intra-household decision-making power. These, in turn, contributed to a measurable shift in gender ideology toward equality norms and a partial reversal of traditional gender roles, particularly in household labor division. The study concludes that the intersection of economic participation and digital empowerment serves as a catalyst for progressive gender restructuring within households. Policy implications include the need for gender-responsive labor policies, investment in digital infrastructure, and targeted interventions to support empowering women in non-traditional work roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Umar Daraz & Štefan Bojnec & Younas Khan, 2025. "Gender Role Reversal in Gig Economy Households: A Sociological Insight from Southeast Asia with Evidence from Pakistan," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:276-:d:1762941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/10/276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/10/276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suzanne M. Bianchi, 2011. "Family Change and Time Allocation in American Families," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 638(1), pages 21-44, November.
    2. Lim, Lin Lean,, 2022. "Key workers in Malaysia during the pandemic," ILO Working Papers 995209293502676, International Labour Organization.
    3. Maria C Tavares & Graça Azevedo & Rui P. Marques, 2022. "The Challenges and Opportunities of Era 5.0 for a More Humanistic and Sustainable Society—A Literature Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Banerjee, Rakesh & Bharati, Tushar & Fakir, Adnan M.S. & Qian, Yiwei & Sunder, Naveen, 2025. "Gender differences in preferences for flexible work hours: Experimental evidence from an online freelancing platform," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Katarzyna Cieslik & Roland Banya & Bhaskar Vira, 2022. "Offline contexts of online jobs: Platform drivers, decent work, and informality in Lagos, Nigeria," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(4), July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Luca & Silvestri, Cecilia & Ruggieri, Alessandro, 2024. "Roadmap to Industry 5.0: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities towards a holistic definition in management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Irfan & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Ahsen Maqsoom & Maria Ghufran, 2023. "A Review on the Way Forward in Construction through Industrial Revolution 5.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Yang Xiao & Yanjie Bian & Lei Zhang, 2020. "Mental Health of Chinese Online Networkers under COVID-19: A Sociological Analysis of Survey Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-17, November.
    4. David S. Johnson & Katherine A. McGonagle & Vicki A. Freedman & Narayan Sastry, 2018. "Fifty Years of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Past, Present, and Future," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 680(1), pages 9-28, November.
    5. Amjad Almusaed & Ibrahim Yitmen & Asaad Almssad, 2023. "Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Jorge Rojo-Ramos & Antonio Castillo-Paredes & María Mendoza-Muñoz & José Carmelo Adsuar & Irene Polo-Campos & Santiago Gomez-Paniagua & Carmen Galán-Arroyo, 2023. "Children’s Influence on Their Parents’ Satisfaction with Physical Activity in Nature: An Exploratory Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-10, March.
    7. Rich Mallett, 2026. "The plat-formalisation fallacy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 58(1), pages 18-37, February.
    8. Maria Akhtar & Azmat Yar Khan & Aneeqa Zubair, 2026. "Metaverse Insights: Boosting Freelancers’ Performance via Work Flexibility and Career Adaptability in the Lens of Social Cognitive Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 2531-2554, February.
    9. Li, Xue & Tan, Alexander Jun Hao & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Investigating gig workers’ commitment to crowdsourced logistics platforms: Fair employment and social exchange perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Wang, Xueyang & Liu, Wenling & Zhu, Yulin & Xiao, Yuedong & Lv, Yiqun, 2026. "The hidden carbon costs of aging: How household dependency burden shapes emissions in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    11. Meredith Dedema & Howard Rosenbaum, 2024. "Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: A systematic literature review: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 344-374, March.
    12. Heather A. Haveman & Lauren S. Beresford, 2012. "If You’re So Smart, Why Aren’t You the Boss? Explaining the Persistent Vertical Gender Gap in Management," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 639(1), pages 114-130, January.
    13. Farzana Afridi & Abhishek Arora & Diva Dhar & Kanika Mahajan, 2023. "Women’s Work, Social Norms and the Marriage Market∗," Working Papers 94, Ashoka University, Department of Economics.
    14. Fahin Faras & Balwant Singh Mehta & Amrita Datta, 2025. "Platform-based Gig Work in India’s Labour Statistics," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 68(1), pages 323-337, March.
    15. Vahideh Shahin & Moslem Alimohammadlou, 2026. "Current status and emerging trends on urban circular economy: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 4595-4638, February.
    16. Gabriela Ioana ENACHE, 2023. "The Impact of Society 5.0 on Supply Chain Management: Opportunities and Challenges," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(2), pages 280-292, May.
    17. Nathalie Havet & Guy Lacroix & Morgane Plantier, 2024. "The impact of parental benefits on disadvantaged households," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 761-779, June.
    18. Kay W. Kim & Jan L. Wallander & Bokyung Kim, 2024. "Associations of Broader Parental Factors with Children’s Happiness and Weight Status through Child Food Intake, Physical Activity, and Screen Time: A Longitudinal Modeling Analysis of South Korean Families," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Philip DeCicca & Harry Krashinsky, 2023. "The effect of education on overall fertility," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 471-503, January.
    20. Farzana Afridi & Abhishek Arora & Diva Dhar & Kanika Mahajan, 2025. "Women’s Work, Social Norms, and the Marriage Market," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(1), pages 141-179.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:276-:d:1762941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.