Author
Listed:
- Martha Angélica Ramírez Salazar
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas, Plan de Pardillo Sn, Parque Industrial, Fresnillo 99059, Zacatecas, Mexico
Postgraduate Department, Universidad Autónoma de Fresnillo, Carretera Federal Panamericana, Lindavista, Ejidal 4, Fresnillo 99039, Zacatecas, Mexico)
- Omar Alejandro Guirette Barbosa
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas, Plan de Pardillo Sn, Parque Industrial, Fresnillo 99059, Zacatecas, Mexico
Postgraduate Department, Universidad Autónoma de Fresnillo, Carretera Federal Panamericana, Lindavista, Ejidal 4, Fresnillo 99039, Zacatecas, Mexico)
- Selene Castañeda-Burciaga
(Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas, Plan de Pardillo Sn, Parque Industrial, Fresnillo 99059, Zacatecas, Mexico
Postgraduate Department, Universidad Autónoma de Fresnillo, Carretera Federal Panamericana, Lindavista, Ejidal 4, Fresnillo 99039, Zacatecas, Mexico)
- Leticia I. García Estrada
(Postgraduate Department, Universidad Autónoma de Fresnillo, Carretera Federal Panamericana, Lindavista, Ejidal 4, Fresnillo 99039, Zacatecas, Mexico
Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Loreto, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Tierra Blanca Km 22, Loreto 98800, Zacatecas, Mexico)
- Juvenal Villanueva-Maldonado
(Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Alameda García Cadena 414, Zacatecas 98000, Zacatecas, Mexico)
- José M. Celaya-Padilla
(Postgraduate Department, Universidad Autónoma de Fresnillo, Carretera Federal Panamericana, Lindavista, Ejidal 4, Fresnillo 99039, Zacatecas, Mexico
Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Alameda García Cadena 414, Zacatecas 98000, Zacatecas, Mexico)
Abstract
Recent advancements have been observed in the global legal framework, particularly in the recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights, among which the right to self-determination stands out. This right encompasses the ability to define their political status and to pursue economic, social, and cultural development autonomously. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) has identified six criteria to evaluate adherence to these rights. This study aims to assess the progress made by Chile, Colombia, and Mexico in meeting these criteria. Employing a non-experimental, cross-sectional, and exploratory research design, the study utilized a questionnaire based on a Likert scale to gather data from residents of Indigenous communities within the three countries under consideration to measure the perception that these individuals have regarding the compliance with the six standards of the IACHR, and specific questions have been designed based on the content of each standard. Once the degree of self-determination is understood, a multivariate analysis technique (Principal Component Analysis) will be used to compare the level of progress by country. The data collection instruments were applied in 2023 (September/November), with the results processed and the final report drafted in early 2024. Findings suggest that the criterion most adequately met is that of cultural identity and non-discrimination, whereas the criterion pertaining to the right to prior, free, and informed consultation and consent is the least fulfilled. Through principal component analysis, it was noted that Colombia exhibits a higher level of compliance with the right to self-determination, followed by Mexico, with Chile demonstrating a divergence and lagging in progress. The study concludes that a significant challenge for these countries lies in continuing efforts to effectively meet these standards and ensure the right to self-determination for Indigenous and tribal peoples.
Suggested Citation
Martha Angélica Ramírez Salazar & Omar Alejandro Guirette Barbosa & Selene Castañeda-Burciaga & Leticia I. García Estrada & Juvenal Villanueva-Maldonado & José M. Celaya-Padilla, 2024.
"Assessing Compliance with Indigenous Self-Determination Standards: A Comparative Analysis of Chile, Colombia, and Mexico,"
Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:218-:d:1506767
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:218-:d:1506767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.