IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v11y2021i4p117-d641768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Humble and Kind: Cultural Humility as a Buffer of the Association between Social Dominance Orientation and Prejudice

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Paolo Visintin

    (Department of Humanities, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Marika Rullo

    (Department of Education, Human Sciences and Intercultural Communication, University of Siena, 52100 Arezzo, Italy)

Abstract

With the rise of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and immigrant minorities, strategies to reduce prejudice and discrimination, and to counteract the impact of intolerant, anti-egalitarian ideologies, are needed. Here we focused on cultural humility, i.e., the ability to have a humble and other-oriented approach to others’ cultural backgrounds, resulting from self-examination and critical thinking about structural privileges and inequalities. In this research we proposed that cultural humility might attenuate the effects of intolerant, anti-egalitarian ideologies such as social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) on negative intergroup attitudes and perceptions. In a correlational study conducted in Italy, we found that cultural humility moderated the associations between SDO and prejudice toward immigrants, as well as between SDO and perceptions of threat posed by immigrants. Specifically, the associations of SDO with prejudice and threat were lower among respondents with high cultural humility compared to respondents with low cultural humility. Conversely, cultural humility did not moderate the effects of RWA on prejudice and threat. Findings are discussed considering the motivations underlying prejudice of high-SDO and high-RWA individuals, and proposing cultural humility training to foster positive intergroup relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Paolo Visintin & Marika Rullo, 2021. "Humble and Kind: Cultural Humility as a Buffer of the Association between Social Dominance Orientation and Prejudice," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-10, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:117-:d:641768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/4/117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/4/117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:117-:d:641768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.