IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v9y2020i7p113-d379641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metapolitical New Right Influencers: The Case of Brittany Pettibone

Author

Listed:
  • Ico Maly

    (Culture Studies Departement, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Far-right movements, activists, and political parties are on the rise worldwide. Several scholars connect this rise of the far-right at least partially to the affordances of digital media and to a new digital metapolitical battle. A lot has been written about the far-right’s adoption of trolling, harassment, and meme-culture in their metapolitical strategy, but researchers have focused less on how far-right vloggers are using the practices of influencer culture for metapolitical goals. This paper tries to fill this gap and bring new theoretical insights based on a digital ethnographic case study. By analyzing political YouTuber and #pizzagate propagator Brittany Pettibone, this paper contributes to our understanding of radicalization processes in relation to the use of digital media.

Suggested Citation

  • Ico Maly, 2020. "Metapolitical New Right Influencers: The Case of Brittany Pettibone," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:7:p:113-:d:379641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/7/113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/7/113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marie Heřmanová, 2022. "Politicisation of the Domestic: Populist Narratives About Covid-19 Among Influencers," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 180-190.
    2. Kristy Campion & Scott Poynting, 2021. "International Nets and National Links: The Global Rise of the Extreme Right—Introduction to Special Issue," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-7, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:9:y:2020:i:7:p:113-:d:379641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.