IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i5p161-d234511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Wir Schaffen Das!”? Spatial Pitfalls of Neighborhood-Based Refugee Reception in Germany—A Case Study of Frankfurt-Rödelheim

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Blank

    (Department of Human Geography, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, D-60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

Refugee reception in Germany is a primarily municipal task that relies heavily on neighborhood-based volunteering. This paper asserts that there are fundamental spatial mismatches between municipal policies and neighborhood-based approaches that place additional burden on all of the stakeholders involved. Drawing from the case of Frankfurt-Rödelheim, which is a socially and ethnically mixed neighborhood in Frankfurt am Main, I show how the way the municipality accommodates refugees disregards the politically embraced work of neighborhood-based volunteers and how the ideal of neighborhood-based inclusion creates a spatial fetish that fails the living reality of the refugees. The findings are based on my ethnographic fieldwork as volunteer in a neighborhood-based welcome initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Blank, 2019. "“Wir Schaffen Das!”? Spatial Pitfalls of Neighborhood-Based Refugee Reception in Germany—A Case Study of Frankfurt-Rödelheim," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:5:p:161-:d:234511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/5/161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/5/161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larissa Fleischmann & Elias Steinhilper, 2017. "The Myth of Apolitical Volunteering for Refugees: German Welcome Culture and a New Dispositif of Helping," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 17-27.
    2. Franziska Werner & Annegret Haase & Nona Renner & Dieter Rink & Malena Rottwinkel & Anika Schmidt, 2018. "The Local Governance of Arrival in Leipzig: Housing of Asylum-Seeking Persons as a Contested Field," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 116-128.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank Eckardt, 2018. "European Cities Planning for Asylum," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 61-63.
    2. Larissa Fleischmann, 2019. "Making Volunteering with Refugees Governable: The Contested Role of ‘Civil Society’ in the German Welcome Culture," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 64-73.
    3. Inka Stock, 2019. "Buddy Schemes between Refugees and Volunteers in Germany: Transformative Potential in an Unequal Relationship?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 128-138.
    4. Julien Puech & François Yondre & Jane Freedman, 2023. "Typology of European Sports Programmes for Welcoming Migrants: Contrasting Political Philosophies," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1381-1411, September.
    5. Burcu Toğral Koca, 2022. "Bordering, Differential Inclusion/Exclusion And Civil Society In The Uk," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 65-81, January.
    6. Sophia Schmid, 2019. "Taking Care of the Other: Visions of a Caring Integration in Female Refugee Support Work," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 118-127.
    7. Annegret Haase & Anika Schmidt & Dieter Rink & Sigrun Kabisch, 2020. "Leipzig’s Inner East as an Arrival Space? Exploring the Trajectory of a Diversifying Neighbourhood," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 89-102.
    8. Robert Larruina & Kees Boersma & Elena Ponzoni, 2019. "Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 53-63.
    9. Verena Schmid & Adalbert Evers & Georg Mildenberger, 2019. "More or Less Political: Findings on a Central Feature of Local Engagement for Refugees in Germany," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 165-175.
    10. Rivka Saltiel, 2020. "Urban Arrival Infrastructures between Political and Humanitarian Support: The ‘Refugee Welcome’ Mo(ve)ment Revisited," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 67-77.
    11. Robin Vandevoordt & Gert Verschraegen, 2019. "The European Refugee Controversy: Civil Solidarity, Cultural Imaginaries and Political Change," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 48-52.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:5:p:161-:d:234511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.