IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v8y2019i3p95-d213653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciding on Discipline: The Importance of Parent Demeanor in the Transmission of Discipline Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica L. Burke

    (Department of Sociology, Francis Marion University, Florence, SC 29502-0547, USA)

  • Jessica M. Doucet

    (Department of Sociology, Francis Marion University, Florence, SC 29502-0547, USA)

Abstract

Although child abuse is a social problem in the United States, many cases go unreported because there is not a consensus as to what disciplinary actions are deemed abusive. Thus, it is paramount to understand the demarcation between physical punishment and physical abuse among parents and their use of certain forms of discipline. This study examines how discipline experienced by adolescent respondents affects their choice of discipline practices in adulthood. A random sample of residents was selected from three South Carolina counties using the 2016 state voter registration list. Respondents were mailed a survey asking questions pertaining to their disciplinary practices and experiences. Analyses were conducted using the ordinary least squares regression. Those who experienced abusive discipline as a child were significantly less likely to report that they use the same discipline techniques as their parents. However, adding parenting traits into the model revealed a mediation effect. Abusive discipline no longer plays a significant role in how respondents discipline their own children once the perceived demeanor of their parent is taken into consideration. These findings suggest that disciplinary techniques are less important than a parent’s attitude when correcting their children’s behavior. Implications for the current research, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica L. Burke & Jessica M. Doucet, 2019. "Deciding on Discipline: The Importance of Parent Demeanor in the Transmission of Discipline Practices," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:95-:d:213653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/3/95/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/3/95/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:95-:d:213653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.