IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i7p110-d156791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democracy, Liberalism and the Challenge of Social Solidarity

Author

Listed:
  • Greg Melleuish

    (School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia)

Abstract

This paper examines modern democracy from the perspective of its capacity to generate social solidarity. To do so it considers the idea of asabiya , first used by Ibn Khaldûn and more recently applied by Peter Turchin. It postulates that this approach is quite similar to the analysis made by Roman historian Sallust. It considers the issue of the creation and decay of asabiya in the context of Benjamin Constant’s distinction between ancient and modern liberty. Ancient liberty seeks to generate asabiya and this has tended to make democracies a belligerent form of polity. Modern liberty and liberalism are happy to leave individuals to cultivate their own garden. This means that while modern democracy, which can be understood as the form of democracy founded on modern liberty, has some belligerent features it tends towards favoring peace. This raises a problem for modern liberal forms of democracy as they face difficulty in creating social solidarity and opponents who can create asabiya and the aggression that goes with it.

Suggested Citation

  • Greg Melleuish, 2018. "Democracy, Liberalism and the Challenge of Social Solidarity," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:7:p:110-:d:156791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/7/110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/7/110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:7:p:110-:d:156791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.