IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i10p181-d172752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolving Responsibility or Revolving Bias? The Role of the Media in the Anti-Sugar Debate in the UK Press

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Topić

    (Leeds Business School, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HB, UK)

  • Ralph Tench

    (Leeds Business School, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HB, UK)

Abstract

This paper analyzed the coverage on the anti-sugar debate and the supermarket industry in the British press, in a period between 2014 and 2015. Using social responsibility of the press theory and a qualitative two-tier content analysis, we first conducted a documentary analysis of public relations materials (press releases and surveys published by Action on Sugar as a main anti-sugar advocate in the UK), and then we traced these public relations materials in the press coverage. We also analyzed whether some sources are preferred more than others by focusing on the nature of quoted sources and whether the media give a voice to everyone, both the anti-sugar activists and the relevant industry figures who claim that sugar is not the only reason for the current obesity problem in the UK. The results show that the media have not given a representative voice to the industry but only to the anti-sugar NGOs, thus opening a question of journalism standards and the extent the press could be considered as socially responsible in this particular case.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Topić & Ralph Tench, 2018. "Evolving Responsibility or Revolving Bias? The Role of the Media in the Anti-Sugar Debate in the UK Press," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:181-:d:172752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:181-:d:172752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.