IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v6y2017i4p155-d123623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Child’s Voice in Determining Program Acceptability for a School-Based Mindfulness Intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Megan McCabe

    (Krongold Clinic, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia)

  • Shane Costello

    (Krongold Clinic, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia)

  • John Roodenburg

    (Krongold Clinic, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia)

Abstract

School-based mindfulness interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing mental health symptoms. However, comparatively little research has investigated the acceptability of these programs from the perspective of the children. Program acceptability underpins engagement, and more engaging programs are also more efficacious (Cowan & Sheridan, 2003; Mautone et al., 2009) yet there is little literature which has considered the acceptability of school-based mindfulness programs. To address this gap, semi-structured interviews were conducted with upper primary aged children (N = 30) who had participated in a six week mindfulness program in four Australian primary schools. Thematic analysis of interviews revealed children found the program to be acceptable. Children reported that they enjoyed doing the mindfulness program, would recommend it to others, and learned about relaxing as well as felt relaxed while doing the program. Children also highlighted the use of culturally appropriate teaching materials and possible stigmatisation as threats to the acceptability of the program. The results of the study support the acceptability of mindfulness programs in school settings, grounded in the unique perspective of the child.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan McCabe & Shane Costello & John Roodenburg, 2017. "The Child’s Voice in Determining Program Acceptability for a School-Based Mindfulness Intervention," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:155-:d:123623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/4/155/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/4/155/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:155-:d:123623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.