IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v6y2017i4p137-d117913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coercive Population Control and Asylum in the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Connie Oxford

    (Gender & Women’s Studies, SUNY Plattsburgh State University of New York at Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, USA)

Abstract

In 1980, China implemented one of the most controversial population policies in modern times. China’s one-child policy shaped population politics for thirty-five years until its dissolution in 2015. During this time, many women were subjected to routine gynecological examinations, pregnancy testing, abortions, and sterilizations, which were often forced upon them by family planning officials. Some women fled China and sought refuge in the United States after having experienced a forced abortion or forced sterilization or feared that they would be subjected to a forced abortion or forced sterilization. This article focuses on how the U.S. government responded to China’s one-child policy through the passage of immigration laws and policies that made asylum a viable option for Chinese nationals who had been persecuted or feared persecution because of coercive population control policies. Based on observations of asylum hearings and interviews with immigration judges and immigration attorneys, this article uses feminist ethnographic methods to show how China’s one-child policy and U.S. asylum laws shape the gender politics of reproduction and migration.

Suggested Citation

  • Connie Oxford, 2017. "Coercive Population Control and Asylum in the U.S," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-30, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:137-:d:117913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/4/137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/4/137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:137-:d:117913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.