IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v6y2017i3p80-d105754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feminisms and the Hijāb : Not Mutually Exclusive

Author

Listed:
  • April L. Najjaj

    (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Texas A&M University—San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78251, USA)

Abstract

The hijab (veil) is the traditional head covering worn by Muslim women throughout the world. In the West, the hijab has come to symbolize an assumed institutionalized oppression of all women in the Muslim world. Many outside Western observers believe that women who wear a veil are forced to wear it, whether by families, husbands, or governments, and examples of the extremes—Afghanistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia—are often considered the norm for all Muslim countries. In reality, the situation is more complex. Using a survey done at the Gulf University for Science & Technology in Kuwait in 2013 (published as “The Veil in Kuwait, Gender, Fashion, Identity”), not only religious concerns but also social and cultural considerations, personal taste and identity, geographic location, socio-economic level, and occasionally conscious rejections of Western influence can all play a part in the decision whether or not to wear a veil. In this preliminary study, I consider this survey as a case study, together with the theory of post-colonial feminism, to find a more nuanced and realistic understanding about the hijab as well as contributing to the development of less Western-oriented definitions of feminism.

Suggested Citation

  • April L. Najjaj, 2017. "Feminisms and the Hijāb : Not Mutually Exclusive," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-8, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:80-:d:105754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/3/80/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/3/80/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    feminism; veil; postcolonialism;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:80-:d:105754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.