IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v6y2017i1p26-d92218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Black Twitter: A Response to Bias in Mainstream Media

Author

Listed:
  • Latoya A. Lee

    (Department of Sociology, State University of New York at Oswego, 313 Mahar Hall, 7060 Route 104, Oswego, NY 13126, USA)

Abstract

This paper seeks to shed light on the ways people of color, in the United States, are using social media to challenge racial bias. As part of this investigation, this paper draws on Critical Race Theory, Feminist Theory, and Digital New Media studies to examine the extent to which social media, while seen as a place for ‘play’ can also operate as a digital homespace, a space used as a tool for black women and men to (re)construct their bodies and identities, challenging the “controlling images” widespread in mainstream media and society at large. This paper employs the methods of content analysis and participant observation and find that these social media forums are not transformative by themselves but instead have little moments that make for resistance and a digital homespace.

Suggested Citation

  • Latoya A. Lee, 2017. "Black Twitter: A Response to Bias in Mainstream Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:26-:d:92218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/1/26/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/1/26/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neslihan Bisgin & Halil Bisgin & Daniel Hummel & Jon Zelner & Belinda L. Needham, 2023. "Did the public attribute the Flint Water Crisis to racism as it was happening? Text analysis of Twitter data to examine causal attributions to racism during a public health crisis," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 165-190, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:6:y:2017:i:1:p:26-:d:92218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.