IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v4y2015i1p192-204d46291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Pathways to Assessment and Care for Infants of Substance Abusing Mothers: Are We Getting It Right?

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Alexander

    (Liverpool Community Health, Health Services Building Level 3, Corner Campbell & Goulburn St., Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia)

  • Shanti Raman

    (Liverpool Community Health, Health Services Building Level 3, Corner Campbell & Goulburn St., Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Terence Yoong

    (Sydney Local Health District, Croydon Health Service, 24 Liverpool Road, Croydon, NSW 2132, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Belinda Mawhinney

    (Sydney Local Health District, Croydon Health Service, 24 Liverpool Road, Croydon, NSW 2132, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

There is documented correlation between parental substance abuse, child maltreatment, and poor outcomes. In two health districts in Sydney, Australia (Site A and B), specialised clinics were established to provide comprehensive assessments for infants of substance abusing mothers (ISAM). We aimed to determine whether there was a difference in outcomes between infants who attended clinic versus those who did not; and to identify differences in the pathways to care between sites. We analysed child protection reports and available health markers of all ISAM referrals in 2011. We held stakeholder meetings with services involved with ISAM in both sites; to describe service components; strengths and weaknesses of pathways. Fifty-five per cent (11/20) attended clinic in Site A; 80% (25/31) in Site B. Three-quarters of ISAM had at least one referral to child welfare; child protection service involvement was more common in those who attended. Immunisation status was lower than the national Australian average; approximately half were seen by community nursing services. Gaps in services, lack of database, and differences in pathways between sites were identified. Attending clinics correlates with child protection service involvement and may afford health protection. Transparent communication, service integration, and shared learning can improve outcomes for this vulnerable group.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Alexander & Shanti Raman & Terence Yoong & Belinda Mawhinney, 2015. "Improving Pathways to Assessment and Care for Infants of Substance Abusing Mothers: Are We Getting It Right?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:192-204:d:46291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/4/1/192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/4/1/192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan R Harvey & Virginia Schmied & Daniel Nicholls & Hannah Dahlen, 2012. "Key components of a service model providing early childhood support for women attending opioid treatment clinics: an Australian state health service review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(17‐18), pages 2528-2537, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sue Peckover & Megan Aston, 2018. "Examining the social construction of surveillance: A critical issue for health visitors and public health nurses working with mothers and children," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 379-389, January.
    2. Cathrine Fowler & Sharon Reid & Jeannie Minnis & Carolyn Day, 2014. "Experiences of mothers with substance dependence: Informing the development of parenting support," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2835-2843, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:192-204:d:46291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.