IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v3y2014i4p771-784d41400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the Clinical Burden of Child Physical Abuse and Neglect in a Large Metropolitan Region: Improving the Evidence-Base

Author

Listed:
  • Shanti Raman

    (Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia)

  • Michelle Maiese

    (Child Protection, Sydney Local Health District, Croydon Health Centre, 24 Liverpool Road, Croydon, NSW 2132, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Katrina Hurley

    (Child, Youth, Women and Families Health, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, GPO Box 1614, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • David Greenfield

    (Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Children at risk of abuse are more likely to be hospitalized and utilize health services according to international research. In a large metropolitan health region in New South Wales, Australia, there was little known of the clinical burden of child physical abuse and/or neglect (PAN), or of systems for clinical assessment of children presenting with abuse/neglect. We aimed to identify the number of children presenting with suspected PAN to emergency departments (EDs) and paediatric services in this region, to determine enablers and barriers to assessment for children with PAN presenting to frontline services, and to identify best practices to address gaps. We collated available data on children presenting to EDs and paediatric services with suspected PAN in 2007. We interviewed 36 health professionals from nine hospitals and 12 statutory child protection professionals, across the region before undertaking relevant document analysis. Of 64,700 paediatric ED presentations, a quarter were due to injury; 2%–5% of these were due to maltreatment. Clinician estimates and assessments of PAN varied widely; health and welfare workers identified major practice gaps, as well as good local practice. We identified feasible minimum standards for improving clinical assessment and follow-up for children presenting with PAN, given the right organizational support.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanti Raman & Michelle Maiese & Katrina Hurley & David Greenfield, 2014. "Addressing the Clinical Burden of Child Physical Abuse and Neglect in a Large Metropolitan Region: Improving the Evidence-Base," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:3:y:2014:i:4:p:771-784:d:41400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/3/4/771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/3/4/771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:3:y:2014:i:4:p:771-784:d:41400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.