Author
Listed:
- Ana Paula Feldmann
(Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Maia, 4475-690 Maia, Portugal)
- Estefânia Silva
(Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Maia, 4475-690 Maia, Portugal
Interdisciplinary Centre for Gender Studies, Institute of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lisbon (CIEG/ISCSP-ULisboa), 1300-663 Lisbon, Portugal)
Abstract
The intensification of armed conflicts has forced thousands of women to seek refuge in other countries, exposing them to conditions of heightened vulnerability, characterized by inequality, violence, and mental health challenges. Despite these adversities, refugee women demonstrate resilience through diverse coping strategies. However, qualitative research centring women’s experiences within gender-sensitive and intersectional frameworks remains limited. This study aims to characterize the experiences of forced migration among refugee women in Portugal and to explore the coping strategies they have developed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six refugee women residing in Portugal. Based on thematic analysis, the data revealed a trajectory marked by material and symbolic losses, disruption of social bonds, and symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress. Motherhood emerged both as motivation and as an obstacle to social and professional integration. Participants reported various coping strategies, including social support, self-efficacy, optimism, emotional regulation, religious coping, and contemplative practices. These findings indicate that coping strategies among refugee women are shaped not only by trauma exposure, but also by gendered structural conditions in the host context. These results highlight the need for gender-sensitive and trauma-informed public policies, as well as community-based interventions to promote social integration and well-being.
Suggested Citation
Ana Paula Feldmann & Estefânia Silva, 2026.
"Gendered and Intersecting Coping in Forced Migration: Refugee Women in Portugal,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:8:p:502-:d:2000285
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:8:p:502-:d:2000285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.