Author
Listed:
- Carolina Papa
(Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva APC e Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva SPC, Viale Castro Pretorio 116, 00185 Rome, Italy
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy)
- Alessandra Mancini
(Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva APC e Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva SPC, Viale Castro Pretorio 116, 00185 Rome, Italy
Italian Academy of Schema Therapy, Viale Castro Pretorio 116, 00185 Rome, Italy)
- Barbara Basile
(Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva APC e Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva SPC, Viale Castro Pretorio 116, 00185 Rome, Italy
Italian Academy of Schema Therapy, Viale Castro Pretorio 116, 00185 Rome, Italy)
- Katia Tenore
(Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva APC e Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva SPC, Viale Castro Pretorio 116, 00185 Rome, Italy
Italian Academy of Schema Therapy, Viale Castro Pretorio 116, 00185 Rome, Italy)
- Francesco Mancini
(Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva APC e Scuola di Psicoterapia Cognitiva SPC, Viale Castro Pretorio 116, 00185 Rome, Italy
Department of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Plinio 44, 00193 Rome, Italy)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges, requiring compliance with public health measures. Notably, guilt is a powerful motivator for rule adherence; however, different types of guilt could have fueled the decision to stay home. This study investigated how guilt propensity influenced Italians’ self-reported motivations for adhering to containment rules. The propensity to different types of guilt, namely deontological and altruistic, was assessed in a total of 393 participants (261 females, 66.4%; 132 males, 33.6%; M age = 34.4, SD = 12.6) in May 2020, between the first and the second phases of Italian lockdown. The survey assessed four guilt dispositions—Moral Norm Violation (MNV), Moral Dirtiness (MODI), Harm-based guilt (HARM), and Empathy-based guilt (EMPATHY)—alongside fear of COVID-19, trust in authorities, and motivations for rule compliance (e.g., protecting one’s own and others’ well-being, respecting authorities, and avoiding sanctions). MNV emerged as a positive predictor of prosocial, authority-based and personal motivations, whereas MODI predicted lower prosocial motivation. HARM selectively predicted prosocial motivation and was negatively associated with authority-based motivations, while EMPATHY negatively predicted self-focused motivations. Moderation analyses revealed small but significant interaction effects, indicating that fear of COVID-19 slightly amplified the influence of EMPATHY and attenuated the effect of HARM, whereas trust in authorities strengthened the link between EMPATHY and prosocial compliance and reduced the association between MNV and prosocial motivations. These findings suggest that compliance during the pandemic was shaped by distinct emotional–moral pathways and that the motivational impact of guilt depends on perceived threat and institutional trust, highlighting the relevance of specific guilt profiles in promoting cooperative and health-protective behaviors.
Suggested Citation
Carolina Papa & Alessandra Mancini & Barbara Basile & Katia Tenore & Francesco Mancini, 2026.
"How Guilt Shapes Public Health Compliance: Distinct Moral–Emotional Pathways During the COVID-19 Pandemic,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:177-:d:1889846
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:177-:d:1889846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.