IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v15y2026i3p161-d1876429.html

“Science Is Important, but Why?” Primary-Age Children’s Lack of Understanding of Why We Study STEM and the Nature of Science Careers

Author

Listed:
  • Cherry Canovan

    (Widening Participation & Public Engagement, University of Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK)

  • Robert Walsh

    (Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK)

Abstract

Despite persistent concerns about STEM workforce shortages in the UK, efforts to promote science study and careers have had limited success in translating into aspirations among young people. It is common for young people in Western industrialised societies to be told that it is important that they study science, but the impact of such messaging, particularly among younger children, is poorly understood. Our study asks whether pupils have absorbed the concept that science is important, why they think this is the case, and what knowledge they have of the careers that may follow from science study. Data was collected via interviews and surveys with 255 young people aged 10–11 in the North West of England. A large majority of our cohort agreed that it was important and useful to study science. However, any understanding of why this might be was superficial and circular; science matters to pass exams, gain qualifications, or become a science teacher, rather than being linked to diverse STEM careers, innovation or real-world applications. Pupils’ knowledge of science careers was narrow and stereotypical, dominated by the generic term “scientist”, medical jobs, and a handful of other roles such as astronaut or palaeontologist. Few participants recognised the breadth of science careers outside of roles encountered in daily life or those prominent in the media. These results highlight a disconnect between superficially positive attitudes and a shallow comprehension which fails to connect school science with potential career paths. Our analysis suggests that this mismatch is likely to impact low-SES groups more severely, thus threatening efforts to improve equity in the STEM workforce. We suggest a number of potential contributing factors, and propose a series of recommendations to tackle this deficit, including introducing more careers-relevant content and access to role models into primary school science lessons.

Suggested Citation

  • Cherry Canovan & Robert Walsh, 2026. "“Science Is Important, but Why?” Primary-Age Children’s Lack of Understanding of Why We Study STEM and the Nature of Science Careers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:161-:d:1876429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/3/161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/3/161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:161-:d:1876429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.