IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v15y2026i2p90-d1855378.html

Cross-Platform UGC Text Analysis on Fertility Topics in Chinese Society: Themes and Sentiments

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Wu

    (Zijin College, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Yuhao Liang

    (College of International Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    School of International Chinese Language Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (School of Journalism and Communication, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China)

Abstract

As China’s demographic transition deepens and fertility rates continue to decline, childbearing has shifted from a private family matter to a salient public issue. Social media platforms have become key arenas in which fertility-related concerns are articulated, negotiated, and publicly constructed. This study analyzes fertility-related user-generated content (UGC) from three major Chinese platforms—Sina Weibo, Douyin, and Toutiao—collected between 30 June and 31 December 2024. Using BERTopic-based topic modeling, sentiment quantification, and cross-platform comparison, the study examines how fertility discourse is thematically organized and emotionally expressed across different platform environments. The results reveal clear platform differentiation. Douyin primarily foregrounds individualized and relational narratives embedded in everyday family life, Toutiao emphasizes gender-neutral, macro-social and policy-oriented interpretations, while Sina Weibo centers on gender relations, institutional arrangements, and rights-based debate. Sentiment analysis indicates that fertility discourse on all three platforms exhibits an overall negative emotional orientation, though with varying intensity. Rather than reflecting uniformly pessimistic fertility attitudes, this negative bias is interpreted as a product of platformized public discourse. The study proposes an emotional filtering mechanism to explain how fertility-related emotions are selectively distributed across communicative spaces: problem-oriented and conflict-laden expressions are more likely to gain visibility in open public platforms. By integrating a platformization perspective, this study demonstrates how platform-specific communication logics shape both the thematic configuration and emotional structure of fertility discourse, offering new insights into the mediated construction of fertility concerns in contemporary China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Wu & Yuhao Liang & Lei Wang, 2026. "Cross-Platform UGC Text Analysis on Fertility Topics in Chinese Society: Themes and Sentiments," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:90-:d:1855378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/2/90/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/2/90/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:90-:d:1855378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.