IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v15y2026i2p64-d1849166.html

Cancer Screening in Older Prison Populations: A Missed Opportunity?

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Austin

    (Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire SO17 1TJ, UK)

  • Emma Plugge

    (Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire SO17 1TJ, UK)

Abstract

The number of older women imprisoned is increasing around the world, leading to an increased demand on health and social care services within prisons. Imprisoned women are considered older by age 50 as they experience a disproportionate burden of cancer and disease. Access to prison cancer screening programmes in prison should mirror access in the community; however, this is not always the case. The purpose of this scoping review is to systematically review the literature relating to enablers and barriers of cancer screening programmes in imprisoned older women. We performed a scoping review using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. Twelve studies were identified. Locations of studies varied across high-income countries. Enablers and barriers were identified within operational, personal, and accessibility categories. To improve mortality relating to cancer diagnosis it is vital that older imprisoned women are supported to access cancer screening. It was identified that older imprisoned women have different needs to other prison populations, and the barriers and enablers identified relate to staffing, communication, peer support, and processes to improve the experience of the older prison population. There is limited research in this area, and older women are a minority in a marginalized prison population. More research is needed to ensure the appropriate and effective development of cancer screening services.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Austin & Emma Plugge, 2026. "Cancer Screening in Older Prison Populations: A Missed Opportunity?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:64-:d:1849166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/2/64/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/2/64/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:64-:d:1849166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.