IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v15y2026i2p132-d1866868.html

The Status Relationship Between Academic and Vocational Education in Urban Norway: Pupils’ Deferential Attitudes to Condescending Opinions

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Tonning Rong

    (Department of Sociology, University of Bergen, Rosenbergsgaten 39, 5020 Bergen, Norway)

Abstract

(1) Background: This article investigates the status relationship between academic and vocational tracks in the four largest cities in Norway. While previous qualitative research has mainly examined academic and vocational tracks separately, this article includes both to highlight the importance of looking at the relationship between them. (2) Method: A thematic qualitative analysis is conducted to illustrate how interviewees in focus groups express practical and academic ambitiousness. (3) Results: The findings indicate that the relationship between vocational- and academic-track pupils is shaped by a perception of vocational education as a second-tier option. Pupils from the academic tracks express condescending opinions about them, whereas those on vocational tracks demonstrate a deferential attitude towards the academic pupils. This hierarchical distinction becomes particularly noticeable when both tracks are situated within the same institutional context. Thus, the article sheds light on the dynamics of status differences between vocational and academic education that indicate a belief in meritocratic principles. This is of relevance for many countries beyond Norway.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Tonning Rong, 2026. "The Status Relationship Between Academic and Vocational Education in Urban Norway: Pupils’ Deferential Attitudes to Condescending Opinions," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:132-:d:1866868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/2/132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/15/2/132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:132-:d:1866868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.