Author
Listed:
- Lotte Remue
(Department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium)
- Marie Jacobs
(Department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Department of Languages and Literatures, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium)
- Katrijn Maryns
(Department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium)
Abstract
Given the critical role of national authorities in the asylum process, sociolinguistic research on inequalities in narrative assessment has prioritised the high-stakes hearings within the official process. It is, however, also crucial to analyse how non-state actors play a central role in asylum bureaucracies. Accordingly, this article focuses on “helping encounters” with social workers, guardians and lawyers on the “backstage side” of the asylum procedure. Drawing on linguistic-ethnographic fieldwork data in the form of participant observation, interviews and audio-recordings, the article reveals striking parallels between the interactional conditions of different social work settings in which service providers familiarise applicants with narrative expectations. Bureaucratic ideologies permeate these environments where mutual trust is indispensable, and applicant/practitioner relationships risk being compromised as a result. This culminates in “compassion fatigue”, a tension between service providers’ frustrations with procedural constraints and their sincere desire for the applicant to succeed. Social workers, limited by the legal boundaries of the system they operate in, can be seen mimicking officials’ interrogation-like style to reanimate the asylum authorities’ judicial reasoning. In this way, they (unintentionally) reproduce the frontstage “culture of disbelief” in the “trusting” backstage.
Suggested Citation
Lotte Remue & Marie Jacobs & Katrijn Maryns, 2026.
"When Stories Tire: Narrative Expectation and Compassion Fatigue in Asylum Helping Encounters,"
Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:130-:d:1866579
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:130-:d:1866579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.